1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: [PhD Qualifier] Hockey puck friction

  1. Jul 20, 2008 #1
    This one seems like it should be easy, not sure where the trouble is.

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    A circular ice rink lies in a horizontal plane. A puck of mass M is propelled from point A along the rail of the ice rink so that the puck moves in a circular path. The magnitude of the initial tangential velocity is [tex]v_0[/tex]. The rail exerts a frictional force [tex]\mu F_c[/tex] on the puck causing the velocity [tex]v(t)[/tex] to decrease with time, [tex]t[/tex]. The magnitude of the centripeal force is [tex]F_c[/tex] and [tex]\mu[/tex] is the coefficient of friction between the puck and the rail. The radius of the ice rink is [tex]R[/tex]. Assume there is no friction between the puck and the ice.

    a) Calculate the speed [tex]v(t)[/tex] of the puck.
    b) Calculate the total distance the puck will travel from t=0 to [tex]t=\infty[/tex], i.e. [tex]s=\int_0^\infty v(t)dt[/tex]

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution

    [tex]F_f=\mu F_c=\mu M a_c = \frac{\mu M v^2}{R}[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{dv}{dt}=-a_f=-\frac{F_f}{M}=-\frac{\mu v^2}{R}[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{dv}{v^2}=-\frac{\mu dt}{R}[/tex]
    [tex]\int_{v0}^{v}\frac{dv}{v^2}=-\int_0^t\frac{\mu dt}{R}[/tex]
    [tex]\frac{1}v-\frac{1}{v_0}=\frac{\mu t}{R}[/tex]
    [tex]v=\frac{R v_0}{R+\mu v_0 t}[/tex]

    Now this result must be incorrect, because
    [tex]s=\int_0^{\infty}{\frac{R v_0}{R+\mu v_0 t}dt}=\frac{R}{\mu}\ln(R+\mu v_0 t)=\infty[/tex] ... nonsense

    Where did I go wrong?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 20, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi confuted! :smile:

    Looks ok to me …

    if the speed goes down by 10, the deceleration goes down by 100 …

    why shouldn't it travel infinitely far? :smile:
  4. Jul 20, 2008 #3
    It just seems nonphysical -- are you sure I haven't made some mistake?
  5. Jul 20, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    "nonphysical"? …

    what about good ol' Newton's first law … isn't that physical??!! :smile:

    Physical things do carry on for ever unless there's some good reason not to! :biggrin:
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook