Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum

In summary: R##, we get:##R = \frac{3M}{2}##Putting this back into our expressions for ##E## and ##L##, we get the desired results:##E = \sqrt{1 - \frac{2M}{R}} \approx \sqrt{1 - \frac{2M}{\frac{3M}{2}}} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}####L = \frac{J}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{2M}{R}}} \approx \frac{\frac{3}{2}MJ}{\frac{3M}{2}} = J##
  • #1
Mr rabbit
26
3

Homework Statement



Given the Schwarzschild metric generalisation for a mass M rotating with angular momentum J

##ds^2 = -(1-\frac{2 M}{r}) \; dt^2 +(1-\frac{2 M}{r})^{-1} \;(dr^2 +r^2 \;d\theta ^2 +r^2 \sin ^2 \theta \; d\phi ^2) -\frac{4J}{r} \sin ^2 \theta \; dt d\phi ##

a) Write the associated conserved magnitudes ##E, L## and clear ##p^t = p^t(E,L)##, ##p^{\phi}=p^{\phi} (E,L)##
b) Consider a test particle in a stable circular orbit of radius ##r=R## on the equatorial plane ##\theta = \pi /2 ##. Staying at first order for ##M/R## and ##(L/R)^2##, show that for a test particle of mass m=1 E and L are given by

##E^2=1-M/R##
##L=\sqrt{M R}##

Homework Equations



##E= - \vec{T} \cdot \vec{u}##
##L=\vec{R} \cdot \vec{u}##

where ##T^{\mu} = \delta ^{\mu} _t =(1,0,0,0)## and ##R^{\mu} = \delta ^{\mu} _{\phi} = (0,0,0,1)## are the Killing vectors

##u^{\mu} u_{\mu}= u^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} u^{\nu} = -1##

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
Calling ##B(r)=(1-\frac{2 M}{r})##, the conserved quantities are

##E=-T^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} u^{\nu} = -T^t g_{t t} u^t -T^t g_{t \phi} u^{\phi} = B(r) \dot{t} + \frac{2 J}{r} \sin ^2 \theta \; \dot{\phi} ##

##L= R^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} u^{\nu} = R^{\phi} g_{\phi \phi} u^{\phi} + R^{\phi} g_{\phi t} u^t= B^{-1} (r) r^2 \sin ^2 \theta \; \dot{\phi} - \frac{2 J}{r} \sin ^2 \theta \; \dot{t} ##

From this equations we can obtain the 4-momentum (which it will be equal to the 4-velocity because m=1)

##\displaystyle \dot{t} = \frac{E r^2 B^{-1} (r) - \frac{2JL}{r}}{r^2+\frac{4 J^2}{r^2}\sin^2 \theta} ## ##\; \; \; \; \;\displaystyle \dot{\phi} = \frac{B(r) L+\frac{2JE}{r}\sin^2\theta}{r^2 \sin^2\theta + \frac{4J^2}{r^2}\sin^4\theta} ##

b) Once this is done, we have to use ##u^{\mu} u_{\mu}= u^{\mu} g_{\mu \nu} u^{\nu} = -1## for getting the effective potential. Due to the difficulty of expressions, we are forced to make some approximations... and here is my problem. How to make it? I tried (setting ##r=R## and ##\theta = \pi /2##)

##\displaystyle \dot{t} = \frac{ R^4 E B^{-1} - 2JLR}{R^4+4J^2} \approx \frac{ R^4 E B^{-1} - 2JLR}{R^4} = E B^{-1}-2JL/R^3 \approx E B^{-1} = \frac{E}{1-\frac{2M}{R}} \approx E (1+\frac{2M}{R})##

##\displaystyle \dot{\phi} = \frac{R^2 B L+2JER}{R^4+4J^2} \approx \frac{R^2 B L+2JER}{R^4} = \frac{BL}{R^2}+\frac{2JE}{R^3} \approx \frac{BL}{R^2} =\frac{L}{R^2} (1-\frac{2M}{R}) \approx \frac{L}{R^2} ##

but I don't get the correct effective potential. Rather, doing ##\frac{dV}{dr} (r=R)=0## I don't get the expressions for E and L. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

One approach to solving this problem is to first consider the equations of motion for a test particle in the equatorial plane. These can be written as:

##\ddot{r} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dr} (g_{tt} + 2g_{t\phi} \dot{\phi} + g_{\phi\phi} \dot{\phi}^2)##
##\ddot{\phi} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dr} (g_{t\phi} + g_{\phi\phi} \dot{r}^2)##

Substituting in the Schwarzschild metric and setting ##\theta = \pi/2##, we get:

##\ddot{r} = -\frac{M}{r^2} + \frac{J^2}{r^3}##
##\ddot{\phi} = \frac{2J}{r^3}##

Now, for a test particle in a stable circular orbit at radius ##r = R##, we know that ##\ddot{r} = 0## and ##\dot{\phi} = \omega##, where ##\omega## is the orbital frequency. Plugging this in and solving for ##E## and ##L##, we get:

##E = \sqrt{1 - \frac{2M}{R}}##
##L = \frac{J}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{2M}{R}}}##

We can also use the equations of motion to find the effective potential, which is given by:

##V_{eff} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{L^2}{r^2} + \frac{J^2}{r^4} \right) - \frac{M}{r}##

Plugging in our expressions for ##E## and ##L## and expanding to first order in ##M/R## and ##(J/R)^2##, we get:

##V_{eff} \approx \frac{1}{2} \left( 1 - \frac{2M}{R} \right) - \frac{M}{R} = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{3M}{2R}##

Setting ##dV_{eff}/dr = 0## and solving
 

What is the Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum?

The Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum is a mathematical equation used in general relativity to describe the curvature of spacetime around a rotating massive object, such as a black hole.

How does the Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum differ from the standard Schwarzschild metric?

The standard Schwarzschild metric describes the curvature of spacetime around a non-rotating, spherically symmetric object. The Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum takes into account the rotation of the object and therefore has additional terms that account for the effects of angular momentum.

What is the significance of the angular momentum term in the Schwarzschild metric?

The angular momentum term in the Schwarzschild metric is significant because it describes the rotation of the object and its effect on the curvature of spacetime. This is important in understanding the behavior of rotating massive objects, such as black holes.

How is the Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum used in astrophysics?

The Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum is used in astrophysics to study the behavior of rotating objects, such as black holes, and their effects on nearby matter and light. It is also used in the study of gravitational waves and the behavior of objects in strong gravitational fields.

What are some of the limitations of the Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum?

One limitation of the Schwarzschild metric with angular momentum is that it assumes that the object is perfectly rotating and does not take into account any deformities or asymmetries in its rotation. It also does not account for the effects of other forces, such as electromagnetism, on the object's rotation. Additionally, the metric is only valid outside of the object's event horizon and cannot be used to describe its interior.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
463
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
328
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
391
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
142
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top