Photodetection Theory: Photo-Oltaic, Photo-Emissive, Photo-Conductive

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between three approaches to photodetection: photo-voltaic, photo-emissive, and photo-conductive. Participants explore the underlying mechanisms, motivations for each approach, and their respective applications in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define photo-voltaic as a change of voltage due to photon absorption, photo-emissive as the emission of an electron following photon absorption, and photo-conductive as a change of resistance due to photon absorption.
  • One participant seeks a deeper understanding of the causes behind these definitions rather than just intuitive explanations.
  • Another participant elaborates that in photoconductors, a photon causes a bound electron to transition to a free state, lowering resistance, while in photoemission, the electron escapes the material. In photovoltaic devices, photon absorption leads to electron-hole separation, creating a voltage change.
  • Questions are raised about the motivations for each approach, including whether photo-emissive is the only method that can count individual photons and the specific applications of photo-voltaic and photo-conductive methods.
  • It is suggested that the choice of approach often depends on the desired measurement sensitivity and the operational wavelength, with photoconductors being effective at longer wavelengths compared to photovoltaic detectors.
  • Participants note that photovoltaic devices are related to solar cells but typically require an external voltage in detector applications to enhance performance.
  • Single photon detection may involve creating cascades of carriers to amplify the signal without necessitating electron emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and curiosity about the mechanisms and applications of each photodetection approach. There is no consensus on the motivations or advantages of each method, indicating multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the operational characteristics of the different photodetection methods depend on specific conditions and definitions that are not fully explored in the discussion.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
Hi All,

I would like to know if there is someone here who is able to explain the difference between these three approaches in photo detection:

photo-oltaic
photo-emissive
photo-conductive.

thank you

DaTario
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Photo-voltaic: change of voltage due to photon absorption.
Photo-emissive: emission of an electron following photon absorption.
Photo-conductive: change of resistance due to photon absorption.

Or you can Google them.
 
Ok, it's more or less intuitive this kind of definition. But I would like to know the causes.

Thank you anyway,

best wishes

DaTario
 
You're right, I'll try to be a little less intuitive.

In a photoconductor, a photon causes a bound electron to transition to a free state, thereby moving more easily and lowering the resistance. Photoemission is similar, but the electron escapes the material. In a photovoltaic device, a photon causes an electron-hole separation in an electric field at a boundary, thereby creating a change in voltage.
 
Last edited:
thank you very much.
 
What are the motivations for each different approach?

Is emission (lending itself to cascade) the only one that can count individual photons? Is voltaic used just for power generation? What advantage does photo-conductive have?
 
cesiumfrog said:
What are the motivations for each different approach?

Is emission (lending itself to cascade) the only one that can count individual photons? Is voltaic used just for power generation? What advantage does photo-conductive have?

I like this question. The motivation is usually a combination of what you want to measure and what is possible. The goal usually is sensitivity. Photoconductor detectors can be made to work at longer wavelengths (in the infrared) than photovoltaic detectors. But photovoltaic detectors can be more sensitive. You are correct that photovoltaic devices are related to solar cells, but in detectors a voltage is usually applied externally to improve performance. Single photons are usually detected by creating cascades of carriers (electrons) that amplify the signal. This can be done within a material and does not require an electron to be emitted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
870
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K