Photodiode and negative resistance

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of photodiodes when exposed to light, specifically addressing the phenomenon of negative resistance and its absence in this context. Participants explore the characteristics of photoconductive versus photovoltaic modes and the implications for current and voltage behavior in photodiodes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to clarify the concept of negative resistance and its relationship to power, questioning the definitions and implications of these terms. There are discussions about the effects of light on the depletion region and the generation of electron-hole pairs. Some participants suggest that quantum tunneling might play a role in negative resistance, while others express confusion about the mechanisms involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance in photodiodes, while others are still grappling with the concepts and seeking clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating complex concepts related to semiconductor physics, including the effects of doping, junction characteristics, and the behavior of photodiodes under different conditions. There is a noted lack of consensus on the definitions and implications of negative resistance in this context.

ndnbolla
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Our professor has asked us why would a photo diode when shined with light, produce no negative resistance.

So far, the only thing I can come up with is because it is in photo conductive orientation (as opposed to photo voltaic) increasing Dark Current thereby eliminating the negative resistance effects.

Can anyone clarify this for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndnbolla said:
Our professor has asked us why would a photo diode when shined with light, produce no negative resistance.

So far, the only thing I can come up with is because it is in photo conductive orientation (as opposed to photo voltaic) increasing Dark Current thereby eliminating the negative resistance effects.

Can anyone clarify this for me?

Can you clarify what is meant by negative resistance in this context?
 
From my notes and his lecture, negative resistance = power
 
ndnbolla said:
From my notes and his lecture, negative resistance = power

No, negative resistance is not power. For one thing, they have different units, so they could not be equal.

Ohms and Watts are not equal units.
 
Shining light into a depleted region decreases its potential creating voltage

Current >>> Electron Hole Pairs

Indeed they are not equal, there is or are step(s) missing.
 
ndnbolla said:
Shining light into a depleted region decreases its potential creating voltage

Current >>> Electron Hole Pairs

Indeed they are not equal, there is or are step(s) missing.

This wikipedia page on Negative Resistance may be of help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_resistance

I would ignore the animation at the top right corner of the page -- I have no idea what it is trying to illustrate. The rest of the article seems good, though.
 
If the voltage in Figure 2 (from wiki link) became reversed biased, would that make the slope positive meaning "positive resistance"?
 
ndnbolla said:
If the voltage in Figure 2 (from wiki link) became reversed biased, would that make the slope positive meaning "positive resistance"?

I certainly don't see any negative slopes in the V-I graph of photodiodes, either in Photovoltaic Mode or in Photoconducting Mode:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photodiode

.
 
now even more confused, let me think a bit
 
  • #10
An interesting problem. I can only think that if a photo-diode exhibits a negative resistance it would have be due possibly to quantum tunneling caused by photon excitement of the PN junction, that would cause decreased current drop across the junction at higher voltages when exhibiting negative resistance. The photo electric effect could cause negative resistance but I am not sure of the mechanism involved.
 
  • #11
Eimacman said:
An interesting problem. I can only think that if a photo-diode exhibits a negative resistance it would have be due possibly to quantum tunneling caused by photon excitement of the PN junction, that would cause decreased current drop across the junction at higher voltages when exhibiting negative resistance. The photo electric effect could cause negative resistance but I am not sure of the mechanism involved.

What's a "decreased current drop across the junction"?
 
  • #12
ndnbolla said:
now even more confused, let me think a bit

When the lines go up and to the right on the V-I diagram, that is positive resistance.
 
  • #13
Greetings berkeman:

Being that this conversation is about photo diodes, the junction of a semiconductor device determines the characteristics of such a device just as the amounts of 'dopant' and elements used to make the conducting P or N substrates. In a liner device if forward voltage is increased current drop will remain constant, positive junction resistance. If the junction is thick, maybe over a couple of thousand angstroms or more, maybe a couple of hundred atoms thick and capable of quantum tunneling, the junction when it reaches avalanche voltage will exhibit negative resistance in that the current drop across junction will decrease weather this is caused by quantum tunneling or the photo voltaic effect. It is the junction of the device that makes it a semiconductor. Even if that junction is formed by a crude quartz crystal being jabbed by an iron whisker.

As for the V-I diagram the voltage applied is measured by a volt meter at the source, neglecting resistance of the wires, and the current, junction current drop, is measured across the device by an ampere meter, there would be a resistive load in series with the device to prevent destruction of the device, the resistance of which and the voltage drop would be determined in advance mathematically.

I hope that this clears this up in that I had to make this post quickly.

Eimacman.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
851
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K