Photon Emission & Atom Entanglement: Spin & Beyond

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of photon emission and atom entanglement, particularly focusing on the conditions under which entanglement occurs, the nature of emitted particles, and the implications of atomic motion on entanglement. It encompasses theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a photon emitted from a nucleus of an atom at rest would be entangled with the atom, especially if their spin angular momentum was zero before emission.
  • Another participant mentions that states of three or more entangled particles have been created, referencing the work of the GHZ team and Anton Zeilinger's teleportation of a photon.
  • A different participant notes that prior to the popularization of "entanglement," the phenomenon was referred to as coherence, and discusses the correlation of spins and energies in products of nuclear reactions until measurement occurs.
  • One participant challenges the notion of an atom being at rest, suggesting that such a state would imply zero energy or a state below absolute zero, which raises questions about the feasibility of the scenario.
  • Another participant references the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, arguing that having an atom completely at rest would require it to be delocalized across space, which is practically impossible.
  • A later reply suggests that entangled particles do not require the atom to be at rest, emphasizing the importance of detecting the entangled state instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of an atom being at rest and the implications for entanglement. There is no consensus on the initial question regarding the entanglement of emitted particles, as various perspectives and conditions are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the definitions of rest and entanglement, as well as the implications of quantum principles like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The discussion remains open-ended regarding the conditions necessary for entanglement.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
If a photon is emitted from the nucleus of an atom, and the atom is at rest is the photon and the atom entangled? If their spin angular momentum was zero before the emission. And is it possible to have an atom emit a photon from its nucleus and one of its electrons at the same time, and would all 3 of these particles be entangled. Or does entanglement only work between 2 particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not technically prepared on this questions, but as I read a lot of divulgence books I just answer the last question.:-p

It has been created a state of three entangled particles (photons) as well as four. The main advances in the field were carried by the GHZ (after Greenberg-Horne-Zeilinger) team, which managed to obtain the first three-particle entangled state.

Anton Zeilinger also managed to teleport a photon :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger_state"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You know, long before the word "entanglement" came onto the popular scene, we used to call it coherence. And yes, all the products resulting from a single reaction are coherent until they are observed or interfered with. A more typical example of a nuclear reaction would be beta decay, in which an electron and neutrino are emitted. And they will be coherent with each other and with the daughter nucleus, meaning that their spins and energies are correlated, but in principle not determined until a measurement takes place, even if they travel to alpha centauri first. The trick comes not in producing such a situation, but in detecting it.
 
The poster above me has already answered to most of the doubts highlighted in the OP but technically isn't it impossible to have an atom at rest or is my thinking wrong? I mean for an atom to be at rest would imply zero energy or an integer below absolute zero :s
 
If you consider Heisenberg principle, to have an atom at completely rest you must have it delocalized everywhere in the space
[itex]\sigma_x\cdot\sigma_p\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}[/itex]

So, even if theoretically you could achieve such condition, it's obviously impossible:-p...
 
Now that I think about it you don't need an atom to be at rest to have entangled particles. Like what Bill K said, the trick is detecting the event.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K