Phyiscal consequences of a neutral massive scalar particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of introducing a neutral massive scalar particle into the Standard Model of particle physics. It establishes that such a particle, if uncharged and stable, would primarily interact through gravity, acting as cold dark matter. Quantum Field Theory (QFT) allows for the creation of particle-antiparticle pairs from sufficient energy collisions, challenging classical assumptions. The stability of these particles is contingent on their density, as annihilation into other particles, such as photons, can occur, particularly if they interact via weak forces, classifying them as WIMPs, potential dark matter candidates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Familiarity with Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Knowledge of particle-antiparticle interactions
  • Basic concepts of dark matter and WIMPs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of WIMPs in dark matter theories
  • Explore the role of particle accelerators in detecting missing energy signatures
  • Study the conditions under which particle-antiparticle pairs can be created in high-energy collisions
  • Investigate the differences between neutral particles and their antiparticles in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, and students interested in the implications of new particle types in theoretical frameworks and dark matter research.

Ilja
Messages
676
Reaction score
83
Let's add a simple uncharged massive particle to, say, the standard model of particle physics. The question is about the physical, observable consequences of this modification.

The first question is if the following considerations are correct, and if not what is wrong.

From a classical point of view, this would only add some stable field, if its initial value is zero it remains zero, if nonzero it remains nonzero, once no interaction terms with anything else are introduced, thus, its only consequence would be via gravity, it would be some cold (particle is massive) dark (no interaction with anything) matter, stable und with no possibility to create it.

Now let's look at this from point of QFT.

If some other heavy particle meets its antiparticle, so that there is sufficient energy, then there would be a possiblility of a creation of a pair (particle and antiparticle) of this new particle type, even without any particular interaction terms.

That means, different from the classical picture, in QFT the particles of this field can be created.

Inversion of this in time: If this new particle meets its antiparticle, they can annihilate and create something different.

Once the particle is neutral, one often hears that it is its own antiparticle. So, what is created is simply a pair of particles, and, reversely, if two particles meet each other, they can annihilate and create some particle-antiparticle pairs of other sorts of (less massive) particles.

That means the particle would be stable only as long as their density is not too large, because, if two particles meet each other, they can annihilate into something else like photons.

Possibility of creation of such particles in particle accelerators: If the energy is large enough, pairs of such particles could be created and fly away in different directions. Once they do not react with anything else, these outcomes would be invisible.

At least in principle, these events could be nonetheless observed - by observing that, if one looks for all visible results, some large amount of energy is missed. And this effect starts to appear at a certain critical amount of energy, which would be 2m of the particle mass.

If all this is fine (my first question) then, is this also realistic? If yes, it is really observed, and what are the results (I could imagine that some range of low masses for such neutral scalar particles with no other interaction at all can be excluded).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This does not look like homework, why did you post it in the homework section?

If some other heavy particle meets its antiparticle, so that there is sufficient energy, then there would be a possiblility of a creation of a pair (particle and antiparticle) of this new particle type, even without any particular interaction terms.
How? You need something that couples to your heavy particle.
Once the particle is neutral, one often hears that it is its own antiparticle.
That is not true. Being neutral is a requirement, but not all neutral particles have to be their own antiparticles.

That means the particle would be stable only as long as their density is not too large, because, if two particles meet each other, they can annihilate into something else like photons.
Again, this would require some interaction. Not the strong and not the electromagnetic interaction, otherwise they would be easily detectable. If they interact with the weak interaction (and gravity) only, they are called WIMP. Those are very good candidates for dark matter.

At least in principle, these events could be nonetheless observed - by observing that, if one looks for all visible results, some large amount of energy is missed. And this effect starts to appear at a certain critical amount of energy, which would be 2m of the particle mass.
You can look for missing energy and threshold effects in electron/positron colliders, where it is possible to reconstruct the whole event.
For proton/antiproton or proton/proton colliders that does not work, but you still get missing transverse momentum as signature.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K