The discussion centers on the physical meaning of spacelike geodesics, contrasting them with timelike geodesics, which represent proper time for objects in free fall. Participants debate whether the geometric interpretation of spacelike geodesics can be considered physical, with some arguing that geometry is integral to physics and others asserting that it lacks intrinsic physical meaning. The conversation highlights the complexities of measuring lengths along spacelike geodesics, especially in non-static spacetimes, and the necessity of conventions for defining physical quantities. Ultimately, the ambiguity of "physical meaning" in this context is acknowledged, indicating that further specification is often required. The dialogue underscores the intricate relationship between geometry and physical interpretation in the realm of spacetime.