Physical meaning of orbital polarization?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of Orbital Polarization (OP) as defined in a specific paper, exploring its physical meaning and its relationship to Orbital Hybridization. Participants examine the implications of orbital occupancy changes due to external factors like strain and the resulting effects on electronic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Orbital Polarization is defined mathematically as the difference in occupancy between the ##d_{x^2-y^2}## and ##d_{z^2}## orbitals.
  • Some participants suggest that under normal conditions, the ##d_{x^2-y^2}## and ##d_{z^2}## orbitals would be equally populated, and strain can lift this degeneracy, leading to different occupancy levels.
  • There is a proposal that the lifting of degeneracy implies a difference in energy between the two orbitals, which could explain the change in occupancy.
  • Some participants argue that Orbital Polarization does not relate to hybridization since it focuses on occupancy rather than modifications of the orbitals themselves.
  • One participant notes that orbitals represent single electron solutions and do not account for electron interactions or bonding, suggesting that OP is a way to consider these complexities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement regarding the relationship between strain and changes in orbital occupancy, particularly the idea that energy differences arise from degeneracy lifting. However, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise implications of these concepts and their interrelations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves assumptions about the nature of orbital occupancy and energy levels, as well as the limitations of single-electron models in capturing the full complexity of electronic interactions.

phys_student1
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
In this paper, the Orbital Polarization (OP) is defined as:

$$OP=\frac{n_{x^2-y^2}-n_{z^2}}{n_{x^2-y^2}+n_{z^2}}$$

where $$n_i$$ is the occupancy of that given orbital. I would like to understand the physical meaning of this. Also, is there a difference between OP and Orbital Hybridization?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert in the field, so do not take what I write here with any authority. It is simply my interpretation.

From what I get from the article, I take it that under normal conditions, the ##d_{x^2-y^2}## and ##d_{z^2}## orbitals would be equally populated by electrons. The presence of strain will lift that degeneracy, and one orbital will end up with a higher electronic occupancy (probability). This is what orbital polarization "measures."

It does not seem to be related to hybridization, in that it does not consider that the orbitals themselves are modified, only their occupancy. Also, hybrid orbitals are usually constructed from equal proportions of the base orbitals.

I think you should keep in mind that orbitals are basically single electron solutions, and do not take into account the presence of other electrons in the atom, or chemical bonding. It is expected that the actual electronic wave function will be only approximated by considering that electrons occupy disctinct orbitals. Orbital polarization appears as one way to take this into account.
 
"The presence of strain will lift that degeneracy, and one orbital will end up with a higher electronic occupancy (probability)"

Does this mean the two orbitals will have different energy? This is what first come to my mind when I see "degeneracy lifting".
 
phys_student1 said:
"The presence of strain will lift that degeneracy, and one orbital will end up with a higher electronic occupancy (probability)"

Does this mean the two orbitals will have different energy? This is what first come to my mind when I see "degeneracy lifting".
I was paraphrasing the article:
One of the major effects of epitaxial strain or heterostructuring is the degeneracy lifting of the ##e_g## states, resulting in ‘orbital polarization’ (OP) of the electronic structure.
I interpreted that as meaning that in the absence of strain, the ##d_{x^2-y^2}## and ##d_{z^2}## orbitals would have the same energy, and thus be equally populated.
 
There must be something changed that causes them to have different occupancy. This thing should be the energy of each orbital. Do you agree with this interpretation?
 
phys_student1 said:
There must be something changed that causes them to have different occupancy. This thing should be the energy of each orbital. Do you agree with this interpretation?
Sounds reasonable.
 
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
958
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K