"Physical system" in quantum mechanics ?

Click For Summary
In quantum mechanics, a physical system is associated with a separable Hilbert space, and understanding its state and evolution is crucial. The division between a physical quantum object and its environment is considered arbitrary, yet it significantly impacts quantum decoherence. The Hamiltonian plays a key role in defining a physical system, particularly through its dynamical configuration variables. The complexity of this division is highlighted in cases where the Hilbert space does not neatly separate into subsystems, such as in quantum field theory. This ongoing discussion touches on the factoring problem and its implications for entanglement and decoherence.
microsansfil
Messages
325
Reaction score
43
Hello

In the usual Hibert-space formulation of quantum mechanics, to each physical system is attached a separable Hilbert Space (generally infine-dimentionnal) over complex field.

A crucial ingrediant in the description of a physical system is the notion of state and evolution of state, however what is a physical system ? Moreover, cutting physical system in "physical quantum object + environment" is arbitrary ?

Behind is the question about Quantum decoherence between physical quantum object and environment. This division into physical sub-system is it always trivial to do ?

Patrick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very good question!

In practice, I would say, one can say "what is a physical system" when one has the Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian is a function of the form H(Q,P), and the system is essentially Q, that is, the set of all dynamical configuration variables.

The object/environment cut is arbitrary, but decoherence depends on this cut.
 
Last edited:
Here is one case where the subsystem seems difficult to define because the Hilbert space is not a tensor product of the Hilbert space of the subsystems: http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.7304. Donnelly is discussing the entanglement entropy which does depend on the reduced density matrix, just like decoherence.

Another place where it seems more natural to talk about the operators associated with subsystems is in strict quantum field theory, where one talks about operators at spacelike separation. When the Hilbert space is infinite dimensional, it seems that the full extent to which quantum mechanics violates the Bell inequalities is still unknown: http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1142.
 
Last edited:
Demystifier said:
The object/environment cut is arbitrary, but decoherence depends on this cut.

This is the so called factoring problem.

It has led to a bit of debate on this forum.

A search will bring up the gory detail.

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
This is the so called factoring problem.

It has led to a bit of debate on this forum.

A search will bring up the gory detail.

Thanks
Bill

To find the debates on this interrogation, I use the filter "factoring problem" in my search on this forum ?

Patrick
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
582
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K