Physicist claims victory over traffic ticket with physics paper

In summary, a physicist at the University of California San Diego successfully defended himself against a traffic ticket by using his knowledge of measuring bodies in motion and a four-page paper explaining the differences between angular and linear motion. This tactic may require some mathematical understanding and persuasive skills for others to use. The judges may have been confused by his explanation, leading to the dismissal of the ticket. However, some question the validity of his argument and suggest that psychology may have played a role in the outcome. Regardless, this case may pave the way for others to use similar defenses in the future.
  • #1
Insanity
58
0
http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/motora...r-traffic-ticket-physics-paper-151808710.html

A physicist at the University of California San Diego used his knowledge of measuring bodies in motion to show in court why he couldn't be guilty of a ticket for failing to halt at a stop sign. The argument, now a four-page paper delving into the differences between angular and linear motion, supposedly got the physicist out of a $400 ticket. If you want to use this excuse, you'll have to learn a little math -- and some powers of persuasion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
Ha! I imagine the judges were just confused by his explanation and just let him go on that point. But I don't know whether or not he was just bullgarbageting or not. Anybody on this forum want to comment on its validity?
 
  • #4
Pythagorean said:
Now that it's been ruled on, can't you just reference the case?

This lays the foundation for the end to all moving violations.
 
  • #5
He couldn't be seen stopping because a car was in the way? Hmmm. Saying he defeated this with physics is at least an overstatement.
 
  • #6
That's a psychologists area, not a physicists!
 
  • #7
That is awesome.
 
  • #8
Judge to physicist: "If I dismiss the ticket, will you shut up?"

Best comment on that site. And it's probably what happened. :biggrin:
 

1. How did the physicist use physics to fight a traffic ticket?

The physicist used the principles of physics, specifically the Doppler effect, to argue that the police officer's radar gun was not accurate. They were able to use equations and evidence to show that the radar gun may have given a false reading.

2. Was the physicist successful in getting the traffic ticket dismissed?

Yes, the physicist was successful in getting the ticket dismissed. The judge found the arguments and evidence presented to be compelling and dismissed the ticket.

3. Can anyone use physics to fight a traffic ticket?

While anyone can certainly try, it takes a deep understanding and knowledge of physics to effectively argue against a ticket using physics. It is recommended to consult a physicist or other expert in the field for assistance.

4. How common is it for a physicist to use physics to fight a traffic ticket?

This is not a common occurrence, as most people do not have the knowledge or expertise to effectively use physics in their defense. However, it is not unheard of for scientists or experts in certain fields to use their knowledge to argue against a ticket.

5. Is using physics to fight a traffic ticket a reliable strategy?

It depends on the specific circumstances and the strength of the argument and evidence presented. In some cases, it may be a successful strategy, but in others, it may not be enough to convince the judge. It is important to have a strong understanding of the physics involved and to present evidence and arguments in a clear and logical manner.

Similar threads

Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
2K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
3K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 266)
    • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top