Physics During Summer: Yes or No?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RigelulZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Summer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations of taking Physics II (Electromagnetism) during a summer session, particularly in the context of an Electrical Engineering student's experience. Participants explore the implications of a condensed course format, the pace of learning, and the importance of mathematical background in understanding the material.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the quality of information received in a summer course, suggesting that the accelerated pace might hinder understanding.
  • Another participant notes that summer courses are typically shorter and more intense, with daily lectures and labs, which may not suit everyone's learning style.
  • Some participants argue that E&M is generally perceived as more abstract and challenging than mechanics, which could complicate the learning experience in a summer format.
  • There is a discussion about the varying lengths of summer courses at different institutions, with some offering six-week sessions and others extending to twelve weeks.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of having a solid mathematical foundation, particularly calculus, to better grasp the concepts in E&M.
  • One participant clarifies that the course in question is a general physics course and not an advanced E&M course, suggesting that the mathematical requirements may be less demanding.
  • Another participant shares their experience of taking calculus concurrently with physics, indicating that a strong math background can ease the learning process.
  • One participant highlights their preference for traditional teaching methods without technology, contrasting it with their previous online-based physics course experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions regarding the feasibility and challenges of taking Physics II during the summer. There is no consensus on whether the accelerated format is beneficial or detrimental, and differing views on the necessary mathematical background for success in the course are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying institutional practices regarding summer course lengths and formats, as well as differing personal experiences with teaching styles and course content. The discussion reflects a diversity of perspectives on the impact of course pacing and mathematical preparation on learning outcomes.

RigelulZ
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello there physics Forums, how are you all today?

I am currently an Electrical Engineering student at my University. I have just finished the first portion of the Physics series (Calculus based Newtonian Physics) I absolutely hated the course, mechanics is definitely not my field but overall i took what i felt i needed (forces and diagrams etc.) I am scheduled to start summer school this coming Monday. I will be taking a programming class and a second class. I was originally going to take the Calculus based Statistics course but i changed my mind. I saw an open spot for Physics II (E&M) and I took it (class is full now).. But i am a bit worried that i might be cheated on some information due to the fact that it is a summer course.. But then again when I think about it.. I have much more time to study and dive into the subject during summer since I'm not as busy.. I was also contemplating on taking Statics for that second class slot.. I am not sure as to what to do, what am I getting into here.. Can anybody give me their honest opinion? I would really appreciate any responses.

Thanks in advance!

-Rígel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E&M is a difficult course, and taking it during the summer would make it more difficult. If you can do it, go for it.
 
RigelulZ said:
I have much more time to study and dive into the subject during summer since I'm not as busy..

On the other hand, you'll be going at a much faster pace. Here, summer school courses run for six weeks versus fifteen weeks during a regular term. A class like intro physics meets for about 1.5 hours lecture every day, five days a week, and there are three labs per week.

For me, its always taken a certain amount of time, not purely class time or study time, for physical concepts to sink in. I think my brain assimilates things partly in the background while I'm doing other things or sleeping. I can't handle a very fast pace like that. But people are different, and you may be able to do it.

Also consider that most students find E&M to be harder than mechanics, because it's more abstract.
 
jtbell said:
On the other hand, you'll be going at a much faster pace. Here, summer school courses run for six weeks versus fifteen weeks during a regular term. A class like intro physics meets for about 1.5 hours lecture every day, five days a week, and there are three labs per week.\

Wow that's a pretty brutal session, my school does it for "Summer C" It takes up twelve weeks, how does that compare?
 
RigelulZ said:
Wow that's a pretty brutal session, my school does it for "Summer C" It takes up twelve weeks, how does that compare?

Thats nothing, my schools summer school type thing for physics is 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, 3 hours of lectures accompained by 3 hours of lab and it is also only 6 weeks long
 
xortan said:
it is also only 6 weeks long

Now i think that's a bit unrealistic.. That is extremely rushed.. I'm glad they offer SS physics for 12 weeks here.. Definitely manageable!
 
Yeah its pretty harsh...which is why I don't want to drop anything and pick it up again in the summer
 
I'd better clarify that when we do physics in summer school, it's six weeks each for Physics I (mechanics) and Physics 2 (E&M), or twelve weeks for both.
 
How much math do you have? Even though E&M normally only requires calc I or calc II, I'd recommend having calc III beforehand. You'll definitely have the upper hand when you do simplified line integrals and such. (E&M is only hard because students do not comprehend the math being used while trying to apply it to abstract physics)
 
  • #10
I think we might be scaring this person unneccessarily. He is talking about General Physics 2 E&M and not full blown E&M. It has been a while, but I don't remember much vector calculus in Halliday and Resnick, for example.

But the more advanced E&M I took? I HAD Calc III beforehand, but that didn't help THAT much with all the PDE's.
 
  • #11
kermit_chem said:
I think we might be scaring this person unneccessarily. He is talking about General Physics 2 E&M and not full blown E&M. It has been a while, but I don't remember much vector calculus in Halliday and Resnick, for example.

But the more advanced E&M I took? I HAD Calc III beforehand, but that didn't help THAT much with all the PDE's.

I know you can do that class without calc III (and that's also why I labeled them "simplified line integrals") but you have to admit that understanding the concepts of calc III would have made intro to E&M much, much easier!
 
  • #12
xcvxcvvc said:
I know you can do that class without calc III (and that's also why I labeled them "simplified line integrals") but you have to admit that understanding the concepts of calc III would have made intro to E&M much, much easier!

In general, the more math background you have, the easier it is to see the Physics. If you don't count HS Physics, and I don't, I was taking Calc III at the same time as I was taking General Physics 2 (which unfortunately was Algebra based). Knowing the math the book was afraid to talk about and the teacher was struggling to avoid made the class pretty easy, but a pretty simplified treatment.

E&M a few years later though was a different kettle of fish. The class kinda had an identity crisis. They didn't have a Physics major program, so it was Math and Chemistry majors who took the few upper level Physics classes offered. The Prof tried to get as real as he we could stand in a one semester class, but while the textbook was a standard one, we were certainly unable to finish it in only one semester.

After that I actually TAed a Summer (Calc based) General Physics class. So much easier to handle and so much more realistic if you are not afraid to show an integral sign.
 
  • #13
Hahaha, no guys not the actual physics major E&M.. As stated originally, i am only an EE major, the only class up to that tier that i will take will be Electromagnetic Fields. And that will be a different story.. I've decided to take the class due to the quality of the teacher offering it as opposed to the quality of the teachers offering it during fall.. It's very important for me to understand all of the concepts in this class, and even though it might be cut 4 weeks short of of a regular school semester, i will take it. Our school's physics dept lacks decent teachers.. For example my Physics I class was too much online based.. Homework.. Lectures (on Wednesdays) i hated it.. That's why i do so much better in my math classes.. No laptops, no cellphones no nothing, if you're caught you are kicked out of the classroom. Just blackboard and notebook. I love that style! I wish all of my classes were like that.. I oppose all of that technology, honestly. Also with the issue of Calculus vs algebra based physics.. It really doesn't matter much for Physics one but it's a different story for Physics II.. How would you integrate a Gaussian surface? LOL, I'm glad i am forced to take the Calculus based. :) Feels good man.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K