Icebreaker
Without the ability to think, how can you possibly grasp the concept of a trash can, let alone math?
JasonRox said:You do not need Philosophy to think, nor does it stand for thought either.
Moonbear said:But all the sciences have arisen from philosophical questioning. In the tree example, philosophy would be the roots, and in my web example, philosophy would be the spider spinning the web.
Scientific method as we know it comes from philosophy. Any new question we are pondering but have not yet fleshed out to begin testing yet also falls within philosophy's umbrella. Remember, that PhD doesn't stand for doctor of physics, it stands for doctor of philosophy.
franznietzsche said:Actually it means "Philosophiae Doctor"
Moonbear said:Which translated into English means "Doctor of Philosophy." -ae is the gerund form in Latin.
Moonbear said:But all the sciences have arisen from philosophical questioning.
Monique said:I think in these forums, there might be a certain bias![]()
Ivan Seeking said:If this was a biology forum I would agree, but physics people are completely objective.![]()
JasonRox said:...and people who were willing TO DO SOMETHING about it, rather than just sit around and think about it.
Icebreaker said:If you conduct experiments blindly without purpose -- which comes from philosophy -- then it's as if you're doing nothing at all.
Note my choice of signature.stjimmy said:What do you think guys.
is physics the hardest, most respected, most broad ranging science?
that you can do any thing you want with it?
what do you think?
what is the study of physics like and what happens after?
stjimmy said:What do you think guys.
is physics the hardest, most respected, most broad ranging science?
that you can do any thing you want with it?
what do you think?
what is the study of physics like and what happens after?