Physics Undergrad Struggles to Retain Knowledge

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LyleJr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a Physics undergraduate's struggle to retain knowledge after completing a Quantum Mechanics (QM) course using Griffiths' textbook. The student emphasizes the importance of repetition and diversifying study materials to reinforce learning. They have supplemented their studies with MIT lecture videos and engage in forums discussing QM questions to maintain familiarity with the content. The student expresses concern about forgetting material before entering graduate school in a theoretical research field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Griffiths' Quantum Mechanics textbook
  • Basic knowledge of Linear Algebra
  • Experience with differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore supplementary resources like Dirac's book on Quantum Mechanics
  • Engage with online forums focused on Quantum Mechanics discussions
  • Utilize MIT OpenCourseWare for additional lecture materials
  • Practice problems related to Linear Algebra and differential equations in QM contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physics undergraduates, graduate school applicants in theoretical research, and anyone seeking effective strategies for retaining complex scientific knowledge.

LyleJr
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am a Physics undergrad with 3 semesters left. I just finished my first QM course this past Spring and did very well and enjoyed the class greatly, but I find that information is already starting to slip away from my memory banks, as it were. It's so much to take in and to be honest, we only covered the first 4 chapters of our textbook (Griffiths).

I know repetition is my best friend when it comes to retaining knowledge, but it is a bit daunting especially considering I want to continue on to grad school in a theoretical research field. I have this fear of getting accepted into a program and then making a fool of myself because I have forgotten so much.

No real question here, just venting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the same material from different sources and relate what you read in a new source to what you have seen already in the previous ones. This helps to create connections that are not so easily forgotten.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, Demystifier and LyleJr
A. Neumaier said:
Read the same material from different sources and relate what you read in a new source to what you have seen already in the previous ones. This helps to create connections that are not so easily forgotten.

Thanks! I have been doing something similar, at least with QM, by supplementing my reading with lecture videos from MIT. It really does help.
 
Or just hang out in sites that discuss QM questions and have a QA format and just reading the posts alone should help keep them fresh.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LyleJr
Did it emphasize the differential equations or the algebra? If the former, have a look at Dirac's book and see how the algebra leads to the calculus.
 
Hendrik Boom said:
Did it emphasize the differential equations or the algebra? If the former, have a look at Dirac's book and see how the algebra leads to the calculus.

I think it did a decent job at both. The entirety of Chapter 3 was spent formalizing the material within Linear Algebra, but again we only did Chapters 1-4 which was just less than half the book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
842
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K