Pi Day Misconception: Is Pi an Irrational Number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Revin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconception regarding the nature of Pi (π) as an irrational number. A user questions whether measuring the circumference of a circle with a radius of 7 cm and dividing it by 14 cm would yield a rational number, implying that Pi could be rational. However, participants clarify that real-world measurements are inherently imprecise, and thus, while the theoretical value of Pi is constant, practical measurements will always yield approximations that cannot represent Pi exactly. This reinforces the understanding that Pi remains an irrational number despite attempts to measure it.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of irrational numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of geometry, specifically circles and circumference
  • Familiarity with measurement precision and limitations
  • Concept of mathematical approximation in real-world scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical proof of Pi being an irrational number
  • Learn about the concept of limits and how they relate to measurements
  • Investigate the implications of measurement error in scientific experiments
  • Study the historical context of Pi and its calculations through various methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying geometry, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of measurement and mathematical constants.

Revin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Happy Pi day folks !
Heres a general misconception I am having. It might turn out to be a pretty easy question so please do help me.

If i pull out my compass to a radius of 7 cm and draw a circle on a paper. Then i'll take a piece of thread and cut it such that it matches exactly with the circle on paper and take the length of that particular thread and divide by 14cm, should i get the value of pi ?

If its so, why isn't pi an irrational number. After all I am dividing the circumfrence I've got by 14 cm.
So it should a rational number.

For example, if the circumfrence is 50.123456 cm ( I've not measured yet just an example)
And i divide it by 14cm

I shall get 50123456/14000000 as value of pi, which is supposedly rational ?

Is it an contradiction ? :eek:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Revin said:
Happy Pi day folks !
Happy Pi day to you too! (And welcome to PF!) :smile:

(this is a message from the future … it's actually Pi-plus-one day here … are you in Alaska?)
For example, if the circumfrence is 50.123456 cm ( I've not measured yet just an example) …

But your measurement won't be an exact rational number, will it?

No matter to how many decimal places you try to measure it, you'll always find a little left over! :wink:
 
Revin said:
For example, if the circumfrence is 50.123456 cm ( I've not measured yet just an example)

How would you manage to measure it to such precision? There are many reasons why an irrational number like pi will be approximated to a rational number with real world measurements. Hypothetically, it should be pi, but realistically, it's impossible to do.
 
Revin said:
Happy Pi day folks !
Heres a general misconception I am having. It might turn out to be a pretty easy question so please do help me.

If i pull out my compass to a radius of 7 cm and draw a circle on a paper. Then i'll take a piece of thread and cut it such that it matches exactly with the circle on paper and take the length of that particular thread and divide by 14cm, should i get the value of pi ?

If its so, why isn't pi an irrational number.
You mean why is pi an irrational number. Or why isn't pi a rational number.

After all I am dividing the circumfrence I've got by 14 cm.
So it should a rational number.

For example, if the circumfrence is 50.123456 cm ( I've not measured yet just an example)
And i divide it by 14cm

I shall get 50123456/14000000 as value of pi, which is supposedly rational ?

Is it an contradiction ? :eek:
No, a "measurement" is never exact. When you talk about "lengths" in geometry you are not talking about measurements.
 
Mentallic said:
Hypothetically, it should be pi, but realistically, it's impossible to do.

Also unrealistic:
- That the circle's radius is exactly 7 cm.
- That this circle drawn with a compass truly is a circle.
 
D H said:
Also unrealistic:
- That the circle's radius is exactly 7 cm.
- That this circle drawn with a compass truly is a circle.

Also
- The thread perfectly tracing the circle.
- The thread perfectly maintaining that same length after being stretched out straight.
- The ruler being perfect.


Even the thread's physical properties are limiting the perfectness of this imperfect exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K