Piece-wise continuous functions on the close interval

Click For Summary
D[a,b], the set of piece-wise continuous functions on the closed interval [a,b], is a subspace of the vector space P[a,b] of all functions on that interval. To demonstrate this, it is essential to show that D[a,b] is closed under addition and subtraction, which involves verifying that the sum of two piecewise continuous functions remains piecewise continuous. This requires defining piecewise continuity, where a function is continuous on finitely many subintervals of non-zero length. Additionally, the zero function must be shown to be piecewise continuous. Understanding the definitions and properties of piecewise continuous functions is crucial for this proof.
physicsss
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
Let D[a,b] be the set of piece-wise continuous functions on the close interval [a,b]. Show that D[a,b] is a subspace of the vector space P[a,b] of all functions defined on the interval [a,b].

Can someone get me started? Do I just need to show that they are closed under addition and subtraction? If so, how do I show that? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to show that the zero function is piecewise continuous. Just go over the definitions of a vector space and piecewise continuous function.
 
How do I make up and write out two piecewise functions and do operations on them?
 
Let f and g be piecewise and continuous (write out the definition, soemthing like, for f there is a partition of [a,b] into finitely many subintervals of nonero length such that f is continuous on each, same for g) then check that f+g sastisfies this definition (which may requiire you to think for a second to porduce the subintervals). i assume you're happy that the sum of continuous functions is continuous.
 
learn the definition of piecewise continuous carefully as it is subtle. (are the smaller intervals open or closed or either?) then subdivide.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K