Pilot Wave Theory: Against the Rest of Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter manases
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pilot wave Rest Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Pilot Wave theory, particularly its contrast with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM). Participants highlight that Pilot Wave theory posits a deterministic universe with an unknown medium of particles, while the Copenhagen interpretation embraces uncertainty and randomness at the particle level. The conversation also touches on the conceptual differences between pilot waves and water waves, emphasizing that pilot waves exist in configuration space rather than 3D space. The current scientific consensus appears to favor the Copenhagen interpretation, although some participants express a preference for the Pilot Wave theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the Copenhagen interpretation of QM
  • Knowledge of the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation
  • Concept of configuration space in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of configuration space in detail
  • Investigate recent studies on the validity of Pilot Wave theory
  • Examine the philosophical implications of determinism versus randomness in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical debates surrounding interpretations of quantum theory.

manases
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi, I was reading about the Pilot Wave theory.

I also found this vid:


Is the Pilot Wave theory against most of the other interpretations of QM?

And what are the main things one needs to accept?
- In pilot wave theory,
--- we have to accept a medium of unknown particles.
--- Universe is determinable
- In Copenhagen theory
--- we have to accept some uncertainty principles
--- we have to accept randomness exists at particle levels

Looking down the line - the pilot wave could evolve to the point when we do understand the medium.
While the Copenhagen theory is fully matured - it just says you can't know now nor in the future.
So basically you can choose to hope in a deterministic Universe or you can abandon this hope?What is the current position on this - which theory do you guys like?
Are there any polls - scientists adhere to the pilot wave theory like 20% or something like this?
I read it was infirmed recently - but not totally - some guys said they didn't found the right values to make it work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like pilot waves too.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DrChinese
manases said:
What is the current position on this - which theory do you guys like?
Quantum mechanics starts to make sense for me on Pilot Wave theory. I always fancied physics to be in the business of physical theories and it ticks that checkbox too.
 
Minnesota Joe said:
Quantum mechanics starts to make sense for me on Pilot Wave theory.
Same with me. Moreover, in my case even Copenhagen QM made much more sense after I understood pilot wave theory.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Minnesota Joe
I see some merit in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation and I appreciate the work which goes into it but pictures like the thumbnail of the video above don't fit well into my mental world of concepts. The picture shows a wavy medium (like water) and a ball which floats in the medium. However, there are big conceptual differences between pilot waves and water waves:
1) Pilot waves don't live in 3D space but in configuration space (which coincides with 3D space only in the case of a single particle).
2) If I remove the ball from the water, the water remains. The pilot wave on the other hand can only coexist with the particle. No particle, no wavy medium.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
10K