Plancherel Theorem (Fourier transform)

Click For Summary
The Plancherel Theorem states that the Fourier transform uniquely extends from functions in the intersection of L1 and L2 spaces to all L2 functions, preserving inner product and norm relationships. Specifically, it asserts that for any functions f and g in L2, the relationships ⟨f̂, ĝ⟩ = 2π⟨f, g⟩ and ||f̂||² = 2π||f||² hold true. The theorem allows the use of the Fourier transform for all L2 functions, confirming that the Fourier transform of an L2 function remains in L2. This unique extension implies that each function has a single Fourier transform image, making it applicable to quadratically integrable functions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective application in Fourier analysis.
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
I'm having a hard time understand this theorem in our book:

The Plancherel Theorem
The Fourier transform, defined originally on ##L^1\cap L^2## extends uniquely to a map from ##L^2## from ##L^2## to itself that satisfies
##\langle \hat f, \hat g \rangle = 2\pi \langle f,g\rangle## and ##||\hat f||^2= 2\pi||f||^2##
for all ##f,g\in L^2##.

I don't really understand the formulation here. Some questions:
What does it mean "extends uniquely" here?
When am I allowed to use the theorem? Can I use the formula for every ##L^2## function?
Is the Fourier transform of an ##L^2## function always an ##L^2## function as well (even if the function is both in ##L^1## and ##L^2##)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Extends uniquely means that there is only one Fourier transform image for each function in the extension.

From Wikipedia
A more precise formulation is that if a function is in both L1(R) and L2(R), then its Fourier transform is in L2(R), and the Fourier transform map is an isometry with respect to the L2 norm. This implies that the Fourier transform map restricted to L1(R) ∩ L2(R) has a unique extension to a linear isometric map L2(R) → L2(R). This isometry is actually a unitary map. In effect, this makes it possible to speak of Fourier transforms of quadratically integrable functions.
--------------------------------------
Second and third questions - answer is yes for both.
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
Incand said:
Can I use the formula for every ##L^2## function?

What do you mean with "the formula"?
 
mathman said:
Extends uniquely means that there is only one Fourier transform image for each function in the extension.

From Wikipedia
A more precise formulation is that if a function is in both L1(R) and L2(R), then its Fourier transform is in L2(R), and the Fourier transform map is an isometry with respect to the L2 norm. This implies that the Fourier transform map restricted to L1(R) ∩ L2(R) has a unique extension to a linear isometric map L2(R) → L2(R). This isometry is actually a unitary map. In effect, this makes it possible to speak of Fourier transforms of quadratically integrable functions.
--------------------------------------
Second and third questions - answer is yes for both.
Thanks! Especially thanks for the link to the article about unitary operators. I understand it a bit better now.

micromass said:
What do you mean with "the formula"?
I meant the ##\langle \hat f, \hat g \rangle = 2\pi \langle f,g\rangle## and ##||\hat f||^2= 2\pi||f||^2## formula. I.e. my question was if I have two ##L^2## functions and I know the Fourier transform of these is the "formula" always true. Which I believe mathman answered was true.
 
Incand said:
Thanks! Especially thanks for the link to the article about unitary operators. I understand it a bit better now.I meant the ##\langle \hat f, \hat g \rangle = 2\pi \langle f,g\rangle## and ##||\hat f||^2= 2\pi||f||^2## formula. I.e. my question was if I have two ##L^2## functions and I know the Fourier transform of these is the "formula" always true. Which I believe mathman answered was true.
It is a standard theorem in Fourier analysis (Plancherel or Parseval).
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K