Does Planet Mass Affect Orbital Period?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between planet mass and orbital period, specifically in the context of gravitational forces as described by Kepler's laws. It is established that while the mass of a planet influences the gravitational force acting on it, the orbital period is primarily determined by the mass of the star and the distance from the star. When the mass of the planet is negligible compared to the star, the orbital dynamics simplify, leading to the conclusion that the planet's mass does not significantly affect its orbital velocity. However, if the planet's mass is comparable to that of the star, both bodies will orbit around their common center of mass, affecting the orbital period.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's laws of planetary motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational force equations, specifically Newton's law of universal gravitation
  • Basic knowledge of circular motion dynamics
  • Concept of center of mass in two-body systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of mass ratios in two-body orbital mechanics
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Kepler's third law
  • Explore the effects of varying mass on orbital stability in exoplanet systems
  • Investigate the dynamics of binary star systems and their influence on planetary orbits
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of celestial mechanics who seek to understand the factors influencing planetary orbits and the dynamics of multi-body systems.

Johnnyallen
Messages
26
Reaction score
4
I recently read a short summary of Kepler 11 and the Kepler Mission. I understand that the orbital period of a planet is a function of its velocity and distance from the star, and the mass of the star will also factor in.
Question: Is the mass of the planet also a factor? In other words, does a more massive planet have to have a greater velocity to maintain equilibrium?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Johnnyallen said:
I recently read a short summary of Kepler 11 and the Kepler Mission. I understand that the orbital period of a planet is a function of its velocity and distance from the star, and the mass of the star will also factor in.
Question: Is the mass of the planet also a factor? In other words, does a more massive planet have to have a greater velocity to maintain equilibrium?
If you equate the force of gravity, ##F=G\frac{m_{star}m_{planet}}{r^2}## with the force required to produce a circular orbit, ##F=m_{planet}\frac{v^2}{r}##, what happens to the mass of the planet?
 
Johnnyallen said:
I recently read a short summary of Kepler 11 and the Kepler Mission. I understand that the orbital period of a planet is a function of its velocity and distance from the star, and the mass of the star will also factor in.
Question: Is the mass of the planet also a factor? In other words, does a more massive planet have to have a greater velocity to maintain equilibrium?
The force attracting a planet depends on its mass but the effect of that force is divided by that mass so the orbit of planets is independent of their mass. However, if your planet's mass becomes significant, compared with the mass of the star it orbits, then star and planet will orbit around the centre of mass, which could be not near the centre of the star. See this link for some maths on the subject.
 
If the mass of a body were a factor in its orbital velocity we could never have built the ISS.
Once it was larger than a single supply ship, we wouldn't be able to dock with it anymore!
 
jbriggs444 said:
If you equate the force of gravity, ##F=G\frac{m_{star}m_{planet}}{r^2}## with the force required to produce a circular orbit, ##F=m_{planet}\frac{v^2}{r}##, what happens to the mass of the planet?

To be fair, this is only true if M_star is much, much larger than M_planet. If the mass of the orbiting body and of the body being orbited are not dramatically different, then orbital period will absolutely depend on both masses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
cjl said:
To be fair, this is only true if M_star is much, much larger than M_planet. If the mass of the orbiting body and of the body being orbited are not dramatically different, then orbital period will absolutely depend on both masses.
Right, as @sophiecentaur pointed out. This could be understood as the "r" in the gravitational force calculation not being the same as the "r" as in the distance to the center of mass of the two-body system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cjl

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K