Planetary gears on passenger vehicles?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of planetary gears in passenger vehicles, particularly in comparison to their application in monster trucks. Participants explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of implementing planetary gear systems in standard automobiles, considering factors such as efficiency, torque requirements, and vehicle design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why planetary gears, which are used in monster trucks, are not also employed in passenger vehicles to improve efficiency and gas mileage.
  • Another participant suggests that the need for planetary gears in vehicles is related to high torque outputs and inertia, questioning whether passenger cars have similar requirements.
  • A participant mentions that while planetary gears can assist in making wheels easier to turn, they are not the only type of gear that can achieve this; other gear systems, pulleys, and levers also play a role.
  • It is noted that automatic cars do utilize planetary gears, and historical examples, such as the Model T Ford, are provided to illustrate their use in early automotive transmissions.
  • One participant emphasizes that planetary gearsets at the wheel can reduce stress on axles and transmissions, particularly in vehicles with larger tires, while also noting that most passenger cars do not require such systems due to efficiency concerns.
  • Some vehicles, like certain 4x4s, do incorporate gearsets at the wheels to manage driveline forces and enhance ground clearance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and efficiency of planetary gears in passenger vehicles, with no consensus reached on whether they would be beneficial or practical in that context.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various factors influencing the use of planetary gears, including vehicle design, comfort, cost, and the specific torque requirements of different vehicles. The discussion acknowledges that the effectiveness of gear systems can vary based on these conditions.

pnorm91
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
so, I'm a mechanical engineering student, fairly new at it though. I have a really strong real world grasp of mechanical principles, and really enjoy doing things like auto repair (consequently, my schedule is often interrupted by folks that know this fact, and want cheap auto repair) so with that in mind, please bear with me in this post, as with any others I may make in the future, should I use an incorrect term, or have a difficult time articulating my ideas.

now, I was watching the modern marvels episode about monster trucks. They mentioned the fact that they use planetary gears on the each wheel since they are so large. which got me thinking; if this helps drive the wheels easier, why would the same not be true of passenger vehicles? If a planetary gear can be used to make each wheel turn easier, would this not improve the efficiency of the vehicle thus improving the gas mileage? just a thought :rolleyes:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You've got to think about the different factors involved. Rather than just give you the answers I'll ask a few leading questionsm, as you'll be able to answer this yourself.


What does the planetary set in the wheel actually do?
Why would this be needed on something with very high torque outputs and high inertia (of the body and wheel)? (Think driveshafts)
Does a passenger car have this requirement?

Also first and foremost passenger cars have to be comfortable and cheap. What would the consequences be of replacing a single final drive with two/four planetary reduction sets in each wheel?
 
makes perfect sense. Thanks much! I've got just one more question, only slightly related, but I assume anyone looking at this thread would be able to answer with ease; When measuring the radius of a gear, would you measure to the tip of a gear tooth, or just to the edge of the circle that the teeth lay on? or perhaps both depending on what youre measuring for?
 
pnorm91 said:
makes perfect sense. Thanks much! I've got just one more question, only slightly related, but I assume anyone looking at this thread would be able to answer with ease; When measuring the radius of a gear, would you measure to the tip of a gear tooth, or just to the edge of the circle that the teeth lay on? or perhaps both depending on what youre measuring for?

The important dimension in gears is "pitch diameter", which is the effective diameter of that gear. It cannot be directly measured, however. Just calculated from other parameters.

They mentioned the fact that they use planetary gears on the each wheel since they are so large. which got me thinking; if this helps drive the wheels easier, why would the same not be true of passenger vehicles

It IS also true for passenger cars. That's why they have gearboxes. You pick a lower gear for starting and for going uphill, as it makes the wheels easier to turn. A higher gear for when you want to move fast. But it's not necessarily planetary gears that make turning the wheel easier, just any gears in general. Pulleys and levers also accomplish the same thing.

Although I do believe that automatic cars DO indeed have planetary gears.
 
Although I do believe that automatic cars DO indeed have planetary gears.

As did the Model T Ford transmission from about 1908 to 1928. It shifted by 'bands' which the driver operated with his foot.

Here's a great link:
http://www.modeltcentral.com/transmission_animation.html
 
Lsos said:
It IS also true for passenger cars. That's why they have gearboxes. You pick a lower gear for starting and for going uphill, as it makes the wheels easier to turn. A higher gear for when you want to move fast. But it's not necessarily planetary gears that make turning the wheel easier, just any gears in general. Pulleys and levers also accomplish the same thing.

You've missed the point. Tractors and monster trucks have a single stage planetary gear-set on each wheel as an extra reduction ratio, on top of the rest of the transmission.

It's done because you need the torque at the wheel but can't/don't want to package a transmission and driveline that can take the full torque.

Although I do believe that automatic cars DO indeed have planetary gears.

All automatic gearboxes are based on planetary gear-sets and engagement clutches.
AMT and DCT aren't true autos.
 
Having a plnetary gearset at the wheel reduces the stress on the axleshafts and transmission through gear reduction- something you need to worry about when you're using 66 inch tires. Most passenger cars don't use them because they're a reduction in total efficiency, "standard" axle shafts can take the torque of a standard engine/transmission combination.

TheFabricator.com said:
The axle housings hold ZF axles. The axle's total reduction is 16.5-to-1; the planetary reduction is 6.3-to-1; and the rear end (also known as the ring and pinion or third member) gear reduction is 2.6-to-1. The huge reduction at the planetaries means that the axles, ring and pinion, drive shafts, and transfer case are under much less stress than before. An example of the benefit of this reduction at the planetary shows up in the axles' size. They are the same size as standard axle shafts used on 1-ton pickup trucks.
http://www.thefabricator.com/article/tubepipefabrication/the-anatomy-of-a-monster-truck

That being said, a very few 4x4 vehicles do have gearsets at the wheels (known as portal axles) to help reduce driveline forces and increase ground clearance to the axle shaft- Hummer H1's and Unimogs for example:

Hummer portal axle cutaway:
330904d1192558955-hummer-portals-portal-cutaway.jpg


Unimog portal axle:
1999-6x6fsus.jpg
 
awesome! Thanks for all of the fantastic input everyone! much appreciated.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
67
Views
16K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K