Planetary habitability in proximity to nebulae

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheDarkFrontie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planetary
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the habitability of planets located near nebulae, specifically the Rosette Nebula. Participants explore the implications of radiation from young stars forming within the nebula and how this affects the potential for Earth-like conditions on nearby planets. The conversation touches on the challenges of maintaining a habitable environment in such proximity, considering factors like magnetic fields and ozone layers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Creative writing-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how far a planet would need to be from the Rosette Nebula to maintain Earth-like conditions, speculating on the dangers posed by radiation from young stars.
  • Another participant suggests that defining "habitable" requires numerous conditions, including a suitable atmosphere and temperature, and notes the inherent challenges of finding a suitable planet within a nebula.
  • A different participant proposes placing the fictional planet 2-4 light years from the nebula, wondering about the visual impact of the nebula from the planet's surface.
  • One participant provides a reference to observable stars and their distances, indicating that proximity to large stars could make a planet uninhabitable due to heat and energy received.
  • Another participant introduces a numerical approach, referencing a specific bright star and discussing safe distances from such stars, while also noting the size of the Rosette Nebula and the potential safety from its OB stars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of habitable planets near nebulae, with no consensus on the specific distances required for safety or habitability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of radiation and the conditions necessary for life.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of defining habitability and the various factors that influence it, including the nature of the surrounding environment and the characteristics of the nebula itself. There are limitations in assumptions about radiation effects and the conditions necessary for life.

TheDarkFrontie
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I would like to apologise in advance for my inherent lack of information in regards to what I am about to ask. I do not have a great understanding of the physics of the universe and such, but I suppose that is partially the reason for forums - to expand knowledge!

Anyway, I would like to pose a question that I hope someone could answer for me. I am planning to write a science fiction novel soon, but one thing I am attempting to do (that I think many others fail to do, be it novelists or screenwriters) is use as much real science as possible. While there are leaps and bounds such as faster-than-light travel, I want the science of the story to be as plausible and believable as possible.

The story involves a journey to a habitable planet near the Rosette Nebula. Now, the question I would like to pose is this. Young stars within nebulae obviously emit radiation while forming (and throughout their lifetime). An entire nebula of young stars would no doubt be rather dangerous in this regard. How far away would a planet need to be from such a nebula in order to have Earth-like conditions for life to evolve? Obviously if it were too close to the nebula (and in this case, the Rosette has a radius of 65 light years), I'm speculating the planet's magnetic field and ozone layer would be insufficient to protect the planet from so much radiation, if it were too close?

On a personal note, it does make one wonder what a nebula like the Rosette would look like from the surface of a planet, especially at night. I imagine it would be quite a beautiful sight!

Any help will be appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Honestly I think it's quite a difficult question you're asking. When you mean habitable, you're certainly talking about human-wise conditions, and we require a lot and i do mean a lot in order to make a planet habitable: a decent atmosphere, acceptable day/night temperature, water, oxygen, etc...
Which all relates essentially to the surrounding of your planet, much like the nature of this planet itself.
The real issue here, is that the location for your fictional planet is near a nebula; obviously it's almost impossible to find a suitable planet inside of a nebula because it is known that the latter is region where stars are born, and born in large numbers so the heat will make the place unhospitable.
In any case for your novel, even staying near a nebula is dangerous, so in my opinion bend the rules, take a gamble and make it about 1 light year away from the edge of the nebula so that the scene will be beautiful (hospitable? not sure).
 
Thanks for your reply, Magna.

Yeah I realize now it is quite a difficult question I am asking! As the Rosette has a 65 light year radius, I was initially thinking of placing the planet around 2-4 light years from the nebula. I'm speculating that even at such a distance, a nebula that is 65 light years across would still look pretty large in the night sky of the planet?
 
Here's a link that shows some observable stars and how distant they are just for reference http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_brightest_stars.
You can see that some observable stars (not necessarily by the naked eye but still) are located from 4 to 400+ light years away. Obviously a 400 light year star would be almost impossible to observe by the naked eye, but a 4 light year cluster of large stars would be still visible.
Keep in mid the following: if you can see a lot of large stars => you are receiving the heat and energy of these stars which can make the planet unhospitable.
Anyhow 2-4 light years seems pretty okay for a good view.
 
Why not work out the numbers?

I once did for how close one can safely get to a very bright star.

Main sequence - Wikipedia Theta1 Orionis C (O6pe V) is one of the brightest known stars at 500,000 solar luminosities. 'll use that as a reference case. So to get the Sun's luminosity from it would require being at 710 AU or 0.0034 pc. That's still much smaller than typical interstellar distances.

The Rosette Nebula's size is about 40 parsecs / 130 light-years. So if one was inside it, one would still be a safe distance away from its OB stars. Even if one was among them, one would likely be a safe distance away from them.

Rosette Nebula - Wikipedia
Rosette Nebula
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K