Planetary Motion HW: Orbit Radius & Speed Around Jupiter

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
k-rod AP 2010
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An explorer plans a mission to place a satellite into a circular orbit around Jupiter, the radius of the planned orbit would be R.

a)The explorer wants the satellite to be sychronized w/ Jupiter's rotation. Determine the required orbital radius in meters.
b) What must the orbital speed of this satellite be in order to maintain this orbital period?



Homework Equations


RJ=7.14x107m
MJ=1.9x1027kg
Jupter's rotational period=3.55x104s
[tex]G\ =\ 6.673(10)\ \times\ 10^{-11}\ m^{3} kg^{-1} s^{-2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


a) T=√(4π2R3/GMJ)
3.55x104s=√(4π2R3/GMJ)
R=1.59374x108 m

b)v=√(GMJ/R)
v=√(GMJ/1.59374x108 m)
v=28207.7 m/s

arm I following the correct procedure on these problems? i am trying to get a handle on this planetary motion stuff and i am not sure if i have yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok, that's what i thought thanks for the help. and another question pertaining to this hw,...

if the orbital speed were mistakingly made slower than needed the orbit would be smaller than desired, and if it were faster than needed the orbit would be larger and more elliptical than wanted right?
 
k-rod AP 2010 said:
ok, that's what i thought thanks for the help. and another question pertaining to this hw,...

if the orbital speed were mistakingly made slower than needed the orbit would be smaller than desired, and if it were faster than needed the orbit would be larger and more elliptical than wanted right?

Not too sure how elliptical it would be in real life, but with the assumption of circular motion

Fc=mv2/r, if 'v' were smaller, the 'r' would need to be smaller to maintain the same Fc, and if 'v' were larger, 'r' would be larger as well. So yes you are correct, but once again, I am not too sure how elliptical the motions would become.
 
ok that's what i was thinking, thanks again for all your help with this problem