Planets & Relativity: Time Dilation in Our Galaxy

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Runei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planets Relativity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stability of stars and their systems within the Milky Way galaxy, highlighting their orbital velocities of approximately 200-250 km/s. It addresses the implications of time dilation due to these velocities, noting that while relativistic effects exist, they are minimal—on the order of milliseconds per day—compared to the significant gravitational effects near massive bodies. The conversation also references the density wave theory to explain the formation of well-defined arms in the galaxy despite the dynamic movement of stars.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orbital mechanics and velocities in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with the concept of time dilation in relativity
  • Knowledge of density wave theory in galactic structure
  • Basic principles of gravitational effects on time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time dilation in GPS technology
  • Explore the density wave theory and its role in galaxy formation
  • Study the effects of gravitational time dilation near massive celestial bodies
  • Investigate the relationship between dark matter and galactic rotation curves
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and science enthusiasts interested in the dynamics of galaxies and the effects of relativity on time measurement.

Runei
Messages
193
Reaction score
17
Hey there

I was wondering: Are the stars and their systems in our galaxy stable relative to each other? I mean - how fast do they move in relation to one another. Are there significant time dilation on some planets or systems in our galaxy relative to us?

I'm thinking about this because I was watching Star Trek, and I was wondering if it wouldn't create problems of time determination if different systems have significant time dilation :)

Just a funny thought :)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The orbital velocity of stars in a galaxy is pretty much constant regardless of the distance from the galactic centre.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_rotation_curve
Which, by the way, is a result that seems to contradict the Keplerian intuition(slower orbital velocity the farther you get - as in e.g.our solar system), and which led to the idea of dark matter.
The orbital speed in Milky Way is roughly 200-250 km/s.

Note that this still means that the galaxy should(intuitively) "wind itself up" into an ever tighter spiral, as the stars closer to the galactic disk's rim have to travel longer distance(2∏R, R=distance from the centre) than the ones closer to the centre, despite having very similar speed.
So, accordingly, stars do not stay in the same places relative to each other. The ones close to the centre overtake those farther away on a regular basis.

That there exist well-defined arms inspite of that is addressed by the density wave theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_wave_theory(nice animation included)

Additionally, stars may have some additional velocity unrelated to their orbital speed, due to e.g.close encounters with other stars.


As for the relativistic effects - these velocities are still significantly lower than the speed of light, so the effects are not great (in the order of magnitude of miliseconds per day).
Still, seeing how the relativistic effects cause e.g. clocks on Earth to run differently than those of Earth's satellites( http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html ), it's not completely negligible - especially for precise measurements.

Note that the gravitational relativistic effects(time runs slower near massive bodies) are much greater in the case mentioned above.



Bottom line: disregarding all the other problems that warping around the galaxy might pose, time synchronisation might be necessary upon arrival, but it wouldn't be anything large.
 
Thank you! Great answer! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K