Plasma Physics as a masters subject

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around guidance for mastering plasma physics at the graduate level, including foundational topics, resources, and applications of the subject. Participants share their insights on effective learning strategies and recommended materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on mastering plasma physics from basic to advanced levels, asking about essential topics and applications.
  • Another participant suggests that understanding the field should begin with discussions with colleagues rather than a textbook approach, emphasizing the importance of intuitive knowledge over detailed mathematical understanding for experimentalists.
  • Resources for basic knowledge in plasma physics are shared, including links to educational websites.
  • Several participants mention recommended textbooks, with Francis Chen's "Introduction to Plasma Physics" noted as a widely accepted introductory text, while others point out that Bittencourt's book is gaining popularity for its broader perspective beyond fusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the best approach to mastering plasma physics, with differing opinions on the importance of intuitive understanding versus detailed study, as well as varying preferences for textbooks.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing views on the necessity of mathematical detail versus intuitive understanding, and the discussion reflects a range of personal experiences and recommendations without resolving these differences.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals interested in pursuing plasma physics, particularly those seeking advice on study strategies and resources.

vinzie
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am into my pst graduation in Physics. And I would like someone to guide me in ho w to master this subject from basic level to the advanced level. What are the main topics one should know very well to start over this subject. It's applications as well.

Thank You!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it comes to these subjects which are out of the basic curriculum, I think it's best to figure out what you need to know by talking to your coworkers. Get a basic idea of what's happening first and what you need to understand before digging into any books. This is especially true if you're working in experimentation rather than theory - it's unlikely you will need to know the exact mathematical details of the field, and it's really not a good use of time to go into too much detail. Consider that through self-study it would take you perhaps two years or more to become theoretically comfortable with the field, enough to start solving problems at all near the complexities involved in real life. It is far better for an experimentalist to have a good intuitive idea of what's going on without too much of the mathematical background, and to only look up relevant subjects when they become necessary. Over time your comprehension will grow, but I feel it's bad to sit down and try to learn it all at the beginning. Once again, if you have any difficulties I would recommend you talk to your colleagues first. They've done this before and they know what's up.

(I say this from experience, because I work in optical physics and I spent a long time when I started trying to "master this subject from basic level to the advanced level" and I really feel that it was the wrong way to go about it. Any current research field is far too large to tackle in that manner, and your personal focus is not likely to cover the vast majority of it. I feel that it's best not to go about it in a textbook sense.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I think Francis Chen's "Introduction to Plasma Physics" book is almost universally accepted as the introductory text for plasma physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Chen's book is the classic, but a lot of people are using Bittencourt's more since it doesn't really go into things specifically from the fusion perspective as does Chen's book.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
6K