Plotting the Parabolic Curve for a Given Equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skaboy607
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correct formulation and plotting of a parabolic curve derived from the equation sigmaY*(1-(L/k)^2/2*(L/k)c^2). Participants clarify that the original equation is ambiguous and suggest two possible interpretations. The correct form for plotting is identified as f(c) = sigmaY*(1 - (L/k)^3c^2/2) or f(c) = sigmaY*(1 - (L/k)c^2/2), with the latter being a valid quadratic equation. The vertex of the parabola is located at (0, A), and the curve opens downward.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and LaTeX
  • Basic knowledge of plotting functions using graphing tools
  • Concept of parabolic curves and their characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to use LaTeX for mathematical notation
  • Explore graphing tools such as Desmos or GeoGebra for plotting equations
  • Study the properties of parabolas and their vertex forms
  • Investigate the application of quadratic equations in physics and engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who need to understand and visualize parabolic curves derived from equations.

skaboy607
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Just wondering if anyone could tell me how I would go about plotting the parabolic curve for the equation:

sigmaY*(1-(L/k)^2/2*(L/k)c^2)

Any help most appreciated

Will
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, that's not an equation. Second, your notation is ambiguous.
Do you mean
f(c)= sigmaY*(1- \frac{(L/k)^2}{2}(L/k) c^2)= sigmaY*(1- (L/k)^3c^2/2)
or
f(c)= sigmaY(1- \frac{(L/k)^2}{2(L/k)} c^2= sigmaY*(1- (L/k)c^2/2)
or
f(x)= sigmaY(1- \frac{L/k)^2}{2(L/k)c^2}= sigmaY*(1- L/(2kc^2))
Since the last is not a quadratic and its graph is not a parabola, you must mean one of the first two. In either case, that is f(c)= A- Bc2 (what A and B are depends on which of the two you meant) which has vertex at (0, A) and opens downward.
 
I will try and write the equation properly next time but I don't know how to use latex.

Ok the equation I have is the third one? but with sigma instead of f(x).

It is from a lab report and have been asked to draw the parabola for it. The original thread is here,

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=280106

Thanks for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K