Here is an opinion from someone who is NOT a tree-hugger:
1. Less than 10% of old-growth trees remain intact here in the U.S. I think it's down to less than 7%, in fact. I say protect them at all costs. If some billion-dollar exec can't make his new desk from an old-growth tree, screw him.
2. Renewable forests comprise more than 90% of all forests here in the U.S., and they've been grown like crops as assuredly as wheat. The only different is the length of the growing cycle.
3. I'd like to see 20% of the land set aside for non-harvesting, and I would like to see those areas allowed to grow into old-growth forests, over time.
4. Anyone who poisons trees should be seen and considered a "limited effect" bio-terrorist," and prosecuted accordingly. That's just sick!
On a more personal note, I spent approximately 160 days over 11 years waterskiing on a lake in Florida. There was a tree there under which we usually camped throughout the day (if we were the first there, and given my Dad's proclivity to wake up earlier than anyone else), we usually managed to arrive around 6am! Perhaps 7am. Whatever. It was shortly after sunrise, and we were almost always the first on site, the first to hit the water, the first to waterski, and the first to enjoy a wonderful breakfast of simple toast, eggs, and sausage cooked by my Mom, about the time others started arriving.
Google Maps says
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&tab=wl"is the tree. I'll check back later to confirm their URL is actually pinpointing the spot.
I grew up under the shade of that tree. I revisited it in the late 90s, and it was still there. On Google Earth, to date, it's still there. If I could afford to put a huge plaque around that tree which states why that tree should be preserved, I would.
That doesn't guarantee squat, but if any of you have any pull with Kingsley Lake or Camp Blanding, please note that tree holds memories for hundreds of us, if not thousands of us over the years.