Polarisability versus Nucleophilicity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Half Infinity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
Click For Summary
In halides, iodide (I-) is the most polarizable anion, while fluoride (F-) is the least. This raises the question of whether I- should be the most nucleophilic in aprotic solvents due to its ability to distort its electron cloud easily. However, polarizability and nucleophilicity are not directly equivalent. While polarizability can correlate with nucleophilicity, especially for uncharged nucleophiles, negatively charged halides behave differently. In this case, nucleophilicity is influenced more by charge density, which inversely correlates with the size of the anion. Thus, despite I- being more polarizable, fluoride (F-) is considered a better nucleophile due to its higher charge density compared to iodide.
Half Infinity
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
In halides, I- is the most polarisable and F- is the least. So shouldn't I- be most nucleophilic ( in aprotic solvent) as its cloud should most easily be distorted and transition state with electrophile should be achieved most easily? Or is polarisability very different from nucleophilicity?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Half Infinity said:
In halides, I- is the most polarisable and F- is the least. So shouldn't I- be most nucleophilic ( in aprotic solvent) as its cloud should most easily be distorted and transition state with electrophile should be achieved most easily? Or is polarisability very different from nucleophilicity?
Polarizability correlates reasonably well with nucleophilicity, but really only when the nucleophile is uncharged. So H2S is a better nucleophile than H2O. But in the case of negatively charged halides, the nucleophilicity is driven more by the charge density, which correlates inversely with the size of the anion (that is, iodide has a lower charge density than fluoride, so fluoride is a better nucleophile).
 
Got it. Thanks
 
What I know and please correct me: a macroscopic probe of raw sugar you can buy from the store can be modeled to be an almost perfect cube of a size of 0.7 up to 1 mm. Let's assume it was really pure, nothing else but a conglomerate of H12C22O11 molecules stacked one over another in layers with van de Waals (?) "forces" keeping them together in a macroscopic state at a temperature of let's say 20 degrees Celsius. Then I use 100 such tiny pieces to throw them in 20 deg water. I stir the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
80
Views
7K