News Police using the help of clairvoyants

  • Thread starter Thread starter greypilgrim
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Police express caution about using clairvoyants, warning against potential charlatans, yet they sometimes accept their assistance as a last resort. The discussion raises questions about the effectiveness of clairvoyants in solving cases, with some citing instances of success. Participants debate whether involving psychics provides additional support or merely publicity for both parties. The conversation also touches on the skills of cold reading, suggesting that some psychics may possess useful interrogation techniques. Overall, the role of clairvoyants in police investigations remains controversial, blending skepticism with curiosity about their potential contributions.
greypilgrim
Messages
579
Reaction score
44
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-buried-forest-just-24257689

On one hand, police warn about charlatans, on the other, they accept the help of clairvoyants as a last resort. Mixed signals much?

Is there a statistics about how often clairvoyants actually successed in finding somebody? Apparently this Michael Schneider did several times.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
greypilgrim said:
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-buried-forest-just-24257689

On one hand, police warn about charlatans, on the other, they accept the help of clairvoyants as a last resort. Mixed signals much?

Is there a statistics about how often clairvoyants actually successed in finding somebody? Apparently this Michael Schneider did several times.
I don't see this as mixed signals if the assistance is free. The "psychic" is looking for free publicity, but then so are the police. And psychic investigation isn't fundamentally different from detective work, so the police are getting a "free" extra set of hands.
 
Oh, I had missed this.
I admit I have been fascinated by this story from the start. Wonder if anything will come of this.
 
russ_watters said:
And psychic investigation isn't fundamentally different from detective work, so the police are getting a "free" extra set of hands.
Although adding a crazy person to your team is seldom, IMHO, a good management decision. Of course in most general investigations there is no bad publicity so a blurb on the local news is probably worth the crazy.
Oh, and the body will be found near water...I can seee it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
If you were a really good investigator wanting to help with a case, maybe you'de need to pretend to be a clairvoyant in order to be taken seriously?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and hutchphd
This sounds like we could do a TV show. We should make one guy black and one white. Naw that won't work...
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre
hutchphd said:
Although adding a crazy person to your team is seldom, IMHO, a good management decision.
You're assuming the psychic is crazy? I'm not; I'm assuming the psychic is a skilled* cold reader+. That's almost exactly the sort of skill you need for interrogations.
Jarvis323 said:
If you were a really good investigator wanting to help with a case, maybe you'd need to pretend to be a clairvoyant in order to be taken seriously?
I think you joke, but I think that in many cases if an investigator is having trouble getting through to a witness/suspect, a "clairvoyant" may have more luck.

*Note; police should only employ successful psychics.
+Not to be confused with "fraud".
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
I think you joke, but I think that in many cases if an investigator is having trouble getting through to a witness/suspect, a "clairvoyant" may have more luck.
I was assuming @Jarvis323 was referencing the US TV show "psych" which had that as a premise. It was a pretty good show (but perhaps parochial...maybe not in UK)
Watching a Crystal Ball carnie psychic at work can be an education in itself. And who is the TV guy who talks to the dead? OMG. The amazing James Randi is unfortunately no longer among us..
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
rsk said:
I admit I have been fascinated by this story from the start. Wonder if anything will come of this.
"I will consult the bones..."



:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes rsk
  • #10
For psychics I defer to American journalist and solid skeptic William Gresham, author of novel
Nightmare Alley also made into a 1947 movie. Fooling the rubes/marks/chumps remains the lifework of priests, grifters, mentalists, professional clairvoyants and lazy lowlifes of many sorts. Their tricks are simple and highly effective, presaging the information age. Want to know something about the family of a missing child: talk to a gabby neighbor.

Stud poker, initially played with one card down and four up cards, one exposed at each betting round; was highly popular when Gresham wrote Nightmare Alley. An 'ace in the hole' could win many small pots when no player bettered their hand. A 'mitt camp' in carney slang refers to clairvoyants who prefer to 'read' lines on the mark's hand to foretell the future while actually studying reactions to stock phrases.

Some ladle out the blarney
In the mitt camp of a carney
And some lecture on the Cosmic Oversoul
But their names would be mud
Like a chump playing stud
If they lost that old ace in the hole.

The ability of smart people to fool the yokels is their 'ace in the hole'.

Gresham also popularized the slang word 'geek'; originally the lowest level of show business that morphed into a verb meaning to do anything for money; currently applied to socially awkward people (circus and show biz folk pitied and shunned the geek).
 

Similar threads

Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
25
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top