[Poll] Should highly biased art be placed in government buildings

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Art Government Poll
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriateness of displaying highly biased artwork in US government buildings, such as courthouses and libraries. Participants explore the implications of partisan art, its potential to provoke outrage, and the distinction between historical and protest art.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what constitutes partisan artwork, with examples provided that include politically charged imagery involving symbols of political parties and the US Constitution.
  • Others argue that the presence of portraits of political figures, such as presidents and secretaries of defense, in government buildings is not partisan art but rather a standard practice.
  • A few participants express skepticism about the feasibility of displaying art that would not offend anyone, suggesting that neutrality is difficult to achieve.
  • There are humorous exchanges about hypothetical examples of partisan art, including exaggerated scenarios involving political figures.
  • Some participants suggest that artwork in government buildings should avoid controversy altogether, proposing neutral themes like landscapes or abstract art.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a piece of art in their family that they find amusing, indicating a subjective interpretation of partisan art.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether highly biased art should be displayed in government buildings. Multiple competing views are presented, with some advocating for its inclusion and others opposing it based on potential controversy.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying definitions of partisan art and the complexities involved in determining what is acceptable in public spaces. There is an acknowledgment of the subjective nature of art and its interpretation.

Should highly partisan artwork be displayed?

  • Yes, partisan artwork should be displayed in government buildings

    Votes: 4 33.3%

  • No, partisan artwork does not belong in government buildings

    Votes: 8 66.7%
  • Total voters
    12
  • #31
Townsend said:
Why can't those people decide what is good for them, themselves? Do you seriously believe they should have the benevolence of you or anyone else to decide for them? Such despotism that would be…. :rolleyes:
Okay then ... they can have the black velvet bullfighter with the matching pillows but don't say I didn't warn you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
The Smoking Man said:
Okay then ... they can have the black velvet bullfighter with the matching pillows but don't say I didn't warn you.

Ok...you have my word that I will never say you didn't warn me... :smile:
 

Similar threads

News Is a Major Overhaul of the US Government Possible? Feedback Wanted!
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K