MHB Polynomial Challenge V: Real Solution Implies $p^2+q^2\ge 8$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the polynomial equation \(x^4 + px^3 + 2x^2 + qx + 1\) has a real solution, then it must hold that \(p^2 + q^2 \geq 8\). By transforming the equation and applying the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, it is shown that the discriminant of a derived quadratic expression must be non-negative for real solutions to exist. If \(p^2 + q^2 < 8\), the discriminant becomes negative, indicating no real solutions for \(y\) and consequently for \(x\). The conclusion reinforces that the condition \(p^2 + q^2 \geq 8\) is necessary for the existence of real solutions to the polynomial equation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that if $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1$ has a real solution, then $p^2+q^2\ge 8$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Show that if $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1 = 0$ has a real solution, then $p^2+q^2\ge 8$.
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]

you need to show that y does not lie between -2 and 2 ( or $y^2 \ge 4 $) else x becomes complex)
 
kaliprasad said:
you need to show that y does not lie between -2 and 2 ( or $y^2 \ge 4 $) else x becomes complex)
[sp]I was expecting to have to do that. But when I came to write out the solution, I saw that if $p^2+q^2<8$ then there is no real solution for $y$ (never mind whether it lies between $-2$ and $2$ or not), and therefore no real solution for $x$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]
Well done, Opalg! It never occurred to be to approach this problem using your method! Thank you Opalg for your neat and easy-to-follow solution and thanks for participating as well.

A solution that I saw online somewhere:

Note that the degree of the polynomial is even, if there exists one real root, then there must exist either two roots of multiplicity one or one root of multiplicity two. Therefore we may write:

$x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax\pm1)(x^2+bx\pm1)$ for some real $a,\,b$.

We now split the problem into two cases:

Case I: $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax+1)(x^2+bx+1)$

The coefficient of $x^2$ from the RHS equals to $2+ab$, setting this equals to 2 gives $ab=0$. WLOG, let $a=0$, then the factorization boils down to $(x^2+1)(x^2+bx+1)$. Since $x^2+1$ has no real rots, $x^2+bx+1$ must have one, so $b^2\ge 4$. Finally, expanding out the RHS and comparing coefficients gives $p=q=b$, so $p^2+q^2=2b^2\ge2(4)=8$, as desired.

Case II: $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax-1)(x^2+bx-1)$

The coefficient of $x^2$ from the RHS equals to $-2+ab$, setting this equals to 2 gives $ab=4$. WLOG, let $p=a+b$, and $p=-(a+b)$. This means that $p^2+q^2=2(a+b)^2=2(a^2+b^2)+4ab=2(a^2+b^2)+16$ and since $a^2+b^2\ge 0$, the entire expression is $\ge 16$, which obviously makes the expression greater than 8, as desired.

Finally, note that when both $x^2$ coefficients are negated, the only aspect of the problem that differs is the sign of the $ax$ and $bx$ coefficients. Running through the steps shown above, it can be seen that this does not affect the value of $p^2+q^2$.

Hence all cases are covered, and so we're done.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top