MHB Polynomial Challenge V: Real Solution Implies $p^2+q^2\ge 8$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if the polynomial equation \(x^4 + px^3 + 2x^2 + qx + 1\) has a real solution, then it must hold that \(p^2 + q^2 \geq 8\). By transforming the equation and applying the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, it is shown that the discriminant of a derived quadratic expression must be non-negative for real solutions to exist. If \(p^2 + q^2 < 8\), the discriminant becomes negative, indicating no real solutions for \(y\) and consequently for \(x\). The conclusion reinforces that the condition \(p^2 + q^2 \geq 8\) is necessary for the existence of real solutions to the polynomial equation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Show that if $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1$ has a real solution, then $p^2+q^2\ge 8$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Show that if $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1 = 0$ has a real solution, then $p^2+q^2\ge 8$.
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]

you need to show that y does not lie between -2 and 2 ( or $y^2 \ge 4 $) else x becomes complex)
 
kaliprasad said:
you need to show that y does not lie between -2 and 2 ( or $y^2 \ge 4 $) else x becomes complex)
[sp]I was expecting to have to do that. But when I came to write out the solution, I saw that if $p^2+q^2<8$ then there is no real solution for $y$ (never mind whether it lies between $-2$ and $2$ or not), and therefore no real solution for $x$.[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Divide through by $x^2$: $(x+x^{-1})^2 + px+qx^{-1} = 0$. Now let $y = x+x^{-1}$, so that the equation becomes $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1}).$

By the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, $(px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(x^2+x^{-2}) = (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2).$ If $y^2 = -(px+qx^{-1})$, then $y^4 = (px+qx^{-1})^2 \leqslant (p^2+q^2)(y^2 - 2)$, so that $y^4 - (p^2+q^2)y^2 + 2(p^2+q^2) \leqslant0$. The discriminant of that quadratic expression in $y^2$ is $(p^2+q^2)^2 - 8(p^2+q^2) = (p^2+q^2)(p^2+q^2-8).$ If $p^2+q^2<8$, the discriminant is negative and so the quadratic expression will have no real zeros. There would then be no real solutions for $y$ and therefore no real solutions for $x$.[/sp]
Well done, Opalg! It never occurred to be to approach this problem using your method! Thank you Opalg for your neat and easy-to-follow solution and thanks for participating as well.

A solution that I saw online somewhere:

Note that the degree of the polynomial is even, if there exists one real root, then there must exist either two roots of multiplicity one or one root of multiplicity two. Therefore we may write:

$x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax\pm1)(x^2+bx\pm1)$ for some real $a,\,b$.

We now split the problem into two cases:

Case I: $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax+1)(x^2+bx+1)$

The coefficient of $x^2$ from the RHS equals to $2+ab$, setting this equals to 2 gives $ab=0$. WLOG, let $a=0$, then the factorization boils down to $(x^2+1)(x^2+bx+1)$. Since $x^2+1$ has no real rots, $x^2+bx+1$ must have one, so $b^2\ge 4$. Finally, expanding out the RHS and comparing coefficients gives $p=q=b$, so $p^2+q^2=2b^2\ge2(4)=8$, as desired.

Case II: $x^4+px^3+2x^2+qx+1=(x^2+ax-1)(x^2+bx-1)$

The coefficient of $x^2$ from the RHS equals to $-2+ab$, setting this equals to 2 gives $ab=4$. WLOG, let $p=a+b$, and $p=-(a+b)$. This means that $p^2+q^2=2(a+b)^2=2(a^2+b^2)+4ab=2(a^2+b^2)+16$ and since $a^2+b^2\ge 0$, the entire expression is $\ge 16$, which obviously makes the expression greater than 8, as desired.

Finally, note that when both $x^2$ coefficients are negated, the only aspect of the problem that differs is the sign of the $ax$ and $bx$ coefficients. Running through the steps shown above, it can be seen that this does not affect the value of $p^2+q^2$.

Hence all cases are covered, and so we're done.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top