MHB Polynomial in n variables: Prove the identity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the identity involving a polynomial in n variables of degree less than or equal to n-1. The identity states that the alternating sum of the polynomial evaluated at all combinations of binary inputs equals zero. It is emphasized that the proof can be simplified by considering the polynomial in a specific monomial form. The key point is that the linearity of the identity allows for this reduction. Ultimately, the identity holds true for all such polynomials, confirming the initial assertion.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Suppose $f$ is a polynomial in $n$ variables, of degree $ \le n − 1$, ($n = 2, 3, 4 ...$ ).Prove the identity:

\[\sum (-1)^{\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2+\epsilon_3+ ...+\epsilon_n}f(\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,\epsilon_3,...,\epsilon_n) = 0\;\;\;\;\; (1)\]

where $\epsilon_i$ is either $0$ or $1$, and the sum is over all $2^n$ combinations.

Hint: The identity $(1)$ is linear in $f$, so it suffices to prove it for $f$ of the form

$f(x_1, x_2, x_3,..., x_n) = x_1^{p_1}x_2^{p_2}x_3^{p_3}...x_n^{p_n}$, where $p_1+p_2+p_3 + ... + p_n \le n-1$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Solution:
Because of the last restriction, at least one of the $p_i$ is $0$, say $p_n = 0$. Then writing the whole sum as the sum of the terms with $\epsilon_n = 0$ and those with $\epsilon_n = 1$, we have:
\[S = (-1)^0 \sum_{\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,...,\epsilon_{n-1}} (-1)^{\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2+\epsilon_3+ ...+\epsilon_{n-1}}\epsilon_1^{p_1}\epsilon_2^{p_2}...\epsilon_{n-1}^{p_{n-1}} + (-1)^1 \sum_{\epsilon_1,\epsilon_2,...,\epsilon_{n-1}} (-1)^{\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2+\epsilon_3+ ...+\epsilon_{n-1}}\epsilon_1^{p_1}\epsilon_2^{p_2}...\epsilon_{n-1}^{p_{n-1}}\]
- which is the difference of two identical terms, hence $S = 0$.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K