Poorly describe movies and guess what they are

  • Thread starter Thread starter blade123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movies
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around creatively summarizing movie plots in a humorous and abstract manner, where participants describe films using vague and often comedic phrases. Notable examples include "Skinhead goes to prison" for "American History X" and "Man erases memory of his ex" for "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind." Participants engage in guessing the movies based on these quirky descriptions, leading to a lively exchange of ideas and interpretations. The conversation touches on various films across genres, with some participants sharing their favorite movies and others providing clues that reference iconic scenes or themes. The thread showcases a playful and collaborative atmosphere as users challenge each other to identify films from cleverly crafted summaries.
  • #251
Ken Natton said:
Okay, I’m going to try a much more difficult one. I dare say many will say that they have never even heard of this film. It is not only not a Hollywood film, it is not even an English language film. However, it did get a great deal of attention when it was released, not least from the censors.

A very troubled young woman is in thrall to a successful businessman. Slowly but surely, she comes to dominate their relationship. But in her final victory, in her final taking possession of him, she also loses him, and her sanity.
Mary Poppins?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #252
Jimmy Snyder said:
Mary Poppins?

Hmmm. Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke in the lead roles in this film. Don't know what to make of that thought...
 
  • #253
Ken Natton said:
Okay, I’m going to try a much more difficult one. I dare say many will say that they have never even heard of this film. It is not only not a Hollywood film, it is not even an English language film. However, it did get a great deal of attention when it was released, not least from the censors.

A very troubled young woman is in thrall to a successful businessman. Slowly but surely, she comes to dominate their relationship. But in her final victory, in her final taking possession of him, she also loses him, and her sanity.

Audition?
 
  • #254
Jimmy said:
Audition?

Wow! I had not heard of that film but checking up on it, I can see why you might think it was the one I was talking about. You are actually in the right language, but the film I am thinking of is quite a bit older. The most remarkable thing about the film I am talking about is that it is a true story. It is set against the backdrop of growing militarism in Japan in the build up to the Second World War.
 
  • #255
Ken Natton said:
Wow! I had not heard of that film but checking up on it, I can see why you might think it was the one I was talking about. You are actually in the right language, but the film I am thinking of is quite a bit older. The most remarkable thing about the film I am talking about is that it is a true story. It is set against the backdrop of growing militarism in Japan in the build up to the Second World War.
Picturing Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke in that film was quite disturbing.

I should have know it would be an older film. ;)
 
  • #256
Spooky, spooky, spooky. If no-one knows what I am on about with this latest film I have mentioned then they won't spot the spooky coincidence. But there is a very strong connection between the film I am talking about and another new thread in General Discussion. I feel the need to point out that I made post #250 on this thread about 2 hours before that thread was started. Spooky, spooky, spooky.
 
  • #257
Ken Natton said:
Spooky, spooky, spooky. If no-one knows what I am on about with this latest film I have mentioned then they won't spot the spooky coincidence. But there is a very strong connection between the film I am talking about and another new thread in General Discussion. I feel the need to point out that I made post #250 on this thread about 2 hours before that thread was started. Spooky, spooky, spooky.
After searching a bit, I think I have identified the film in question. The above seems to confirm it- if you're are indeed referring to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=513826".

In the Realm of the Senses - A 1976 Franco-Japanese film

That is a little spooky.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #258
Jimmy said:
After searching a bit, I think I have identified the film in question. The above seems to confirm it- if you're are indeed referring to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=513826".

In the Realm of the Senses - A 1976 Franco-Japanese film

That is a little spooky.

Ai No Corrida - In The Realm of the Senses - is indeed the film I was thinking of. I always thought that the controversy that surrounded this film was a pity because it always seemed to me to fail to spot the key point, which is that it is actually a very melancholy story. It might seem a strange thing to pick-up on but I always liked the music from that film. It was specially written for the film by Minoru Miki, and he clearly got it. The French only became involved because of the Japanese censors. Apparently the film was taken from Japan undeveloped and then developed in France. It was indeed the French who marketed and distributed it. Anyway, well done Jimmy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #259
Ken Natton said:
Ai No Corrida - In The Realm of the Senses - is indeed the film I was thinking of. I always thought that the controversy that surrounded this film was a pity because it always seemed to me to fail to spot the key point, which is that it is actually a very melancholy story. It might seem a strange thing to pick-up on but I always liked the music from that film. It was specially written for the film by Minoru Miki, and he clearly got it. The French only became involved because of the Japenses censors. Apparently the film was taken from Japan undeveloped and then developed in France. It was indeed the French who marketed and distributed it.
I may have to keep this one in mind for future viewing. Netscape has it on DVD. No instant streaming though.

Anyway, well done Jimmy.
Well, I can't take too much credit for that one. I had to search vigorously through lists of Japanese films. I did find it just before your last hint though. That just proves I can perform a decent web search. I'm not much of a film aficionado.

Here's one that isn't quite as obscure:
A homicidal humpback attempts to cease power in this adaptation of a play.

There have been several film adaptations but they are all titled the same.
 
  • #260
Jimmy said:
There have been several film adaptations but they are all titled the same.
I believe you may be referring to that "bunch-backed toad" otherwise known as Richard the Third.
 
  • #261
zoobyshoe said:
I believe you may be referring to that "bunch-backed toad" otherwise known as Richard the Third.

Just so.
 
  • #262
OK, here are some tough ones...

1) It's a story about snakes on board an airplane.

2) It's a story about the interaction between some cowboys and some aliens.
 
  • #263
Math Is Hard said:
OK, here are some tough ones...

1) It's a story about snakes on board an airplane.

2) It's a story about the interaction between some cowboys and some aliens.


Interesting, Math Is Hard. You don’t seem to be taking it too seriously, but I am not sure whether you mean to extract the Michael. I confess that I had never heard of either film before and with titles like Snakes on a Plane and Cowboys and Aliens I might not have set my expectations too high. But when I then see that the star of one is Samuel L Jackson, among the stars of the other is Harrison Ford and the executive producer of the other is Steven Spielberg I’m forced to take them a little more seriously. Not that I think I’ll be watching either any time soon – unless you can persuade me that I should. Somehow I don’t think you intended to recommend them. Not sure what you did intend though.
 
  • #264
Ken Natton said:
Not sure what you did intend though.

She intended me to laugh. Which I did. That was funny.

It's riff on the themes of obscure descriptions of movies: utterly unobscure descriptions.



But since we're talking about this thread: my opinion is that people have pretty much missed the point. It wasn't simply 'describe a movie briefly', it was 'describe a movie badly'.

Vanadium50 and Evo had some good ones:

'Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets and then teams up with three strangers to kill again.'

'Jogger gets hit by car'


They are technically correct, but emphasize so utterly the wrong parts of the movie, that it makes for a hilarious description once you get it.

IMO, the other 95% of the submissions in this thread miss this key point of comedic delivery.
 
Last edited:
  • #265
Apropos: examining a joke is like dissecting a frog. You learn how it works, but the frog dies.
 
  • #266
Ken Natton said:
Interesting, Math Is Hard. You don’t seem to be taking it too seriously...

Yeah, MiH, you aren't taking this seriously at all!
 
  • #267
I'm taking it seriously.
 
  • #268
Okay, message read load and clear. I perceived a problem that when the clue was too obscure, everyone ignored it and it sunk without being answered. I sought to ensure that answers were reached before the original reference disappeared. I also saw it as an opportunity to discuss, briefly, the films thus mentioned as well. That seemed worthwhile and entertaining to me. My apologies for the intrusion.
 
  • #269
DaveC426913 said:
my opinion is that people have pretty much missed the point. It wasn't simply 'describe a movie briefly', it was 'describe a movie badly'.
I think an overly brief or vague description can be considered a poor description as well. If a description is funny too, that's a bonus! :biggrin:
</metadiscussion>

Jimmy said:
1. Man talks into tape recorder and watches himself.

[STRIKE]2. A small, white animal causes a man to soil himself.[/STRIKE] (Monty Python and the Holy Grail - Janus)

3. An average man and a woman who "paints people and fruit and..." end up in the future.
Hints:
1. An independent film involving time travel.
2. Average man becomes president.
 
  • #270
Ken Natton said:
Okay, message read load and clear. I perceived a problem that when the clue was too obscure, everyone ignored it and it sunk without being answered. I sought to ensure that answers were reached before the original reference disappeared. I also saw it as an opportunity to discuss, briefly, the films thus mentioned as well. That seemed worthwhile and entertaining to me. My apologies for the intrusion.

Not sure how you're 'intruding'. Isn't this thread 'your baby'? :smile:
 
  • #271
Jimmy said:
I think an overly brief or vague description can be considered a poor description as well. If a description is funny too, that's a bonus! :biggrin:
</metadiscussion>

But the humour only comes in the payoff - when you go 'murderous little girl? Oh! Dorothy! Haha yeah.'

To me, this is more like regular trivia. Which is OK too. And I wouldn't have reaised it except for Ken's meta comment about the thread.
 
  • #272
I hear ya, brother. :wink:
 
  • #273
Math Is Hard said:
OK, here are some tough ones...

1) It's a story about snakes on board an airplane.

2) It's a story about the interaction between some cowboys and some aliens.

The answer to #1 is Knight and Day.
 
  • #274
DaveC426913 said:
Isn't this thread 'your baby'? :smile:

No, I wouldn’t have said so. It was started by blade123 who seems to have vanished from it. But clearly he / she started a great thread – it has generated a great deal of interest. My feeling was that part of that was because it was such a fast changing and evolving thread. Initially, I saw myself only as introducing some films of a different style than those that dominated the early pages. But I certainly don’t seek to proscribe where it goes from here, I’m as interested as anyone else to see that and to ride the surf. I was just defending my contribution which seemed to be under criticism, that’s all. Really it’s not important. Let the clues, obscure or otherwise continue.
 
  • #275
I got Moonstruck from the county library. It was OK, but I wouldn't say I loved it awful.
 
  • #276
1) policeman finds a big treasure. his partner dies and fur coats can destroy druglords

2) man walking around in desert plays instrument and shoots people really quickly
 
  • #277
wisvuze said:
1) policeman finds a big treasure. his partner dies and fur coats can destroy druglords

2) man walking around in desert plays instrument and shoots people really quickly

1) American Gangster
 
  • #278
wisvuze said:
1) policeman finds a big treasure. his partner dies and fur coats can destroy druglords

2) man walking around in desert plays instrument and shoots people really quickly

2) Once Upon A Time In The West (has awesome soundtrack)
 
  • #279
Both correct, you guys are good aha
 
  • #280
Evil Machine kills people.
 
  • #281
Andy said:
Evil Machine kills people.

Terminator!
 
  • #282
nucleargirl said:
Terminator!
He probably means Terminator II.
 
  • #283
Andy said:
Evil Machine kills people.

Christine
 
  • #284
Andy said:
Evil Machine kills people.

Killdozer
 
  • #285
I was thinking of the origional terminator
 
  • #286
yay! :)

does that mean its my go next?!

ok: super funny interracial... that you'd walk a thousand miles to see.

too easy?!

another one? : cat gets soaking wet, film ends happily.

and another? over-hyped, long-winded black and white that has no plot and no-body gets it so they all say its amazingly funny.
 
Last edited:
  • #287
Andy said:
Evil Machine kills people.

50% of the science fiction films made since the late 60's.
 
  • #288
I have no idea nukey girl.
 
  • #289
nucleargirl said:
over-hyped, long-winded black and white that has no plot and no-body gets it so they all say its amazingly funny.
City Lights?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot1-O7nEvmk
 
  • #290
Andy said:
I have no idea nukey girl.

lol, guess I'm good at this game :p

hm hints...

1st film: inter-racial AND inter-sexual! shown literally on the DVD cover.

2nd film: Title: eating where they sell best friends.

3rd film: ok, maybe it was just me who didn't get it. it also had a long-winded title! and if I understood correctly, the main characters were Nazis.
 
  • #291
sorry Jimmy, not City Lights, though I haven't seen it so wouldn't know if it fits my description.
 
  • #292
nucleargirl said:
2nd film: Title: eating where they sell best friends.
Breakfast at Tiffany's
 
  • #293
Jimmy Snyder said:
Breakfast at Tiffany's

yes!
 
  • #294
Jimmy Snyder said:
City Lights?

:) I like that clip. Its smart! and has great accompanying music!
 
  • #295
nucleargirl said:
yes!
I've never seen the movie, but I'll probably get it from the Library now. Here's the opening credits. I was in Savannah, Georgia a few years back. The tour takes you past Forest Gump's bus stop bench, the theater where Lady Chablis sings, and everything Johnny Mercer. Then, just to dot our i's and cross our rivers, we loaded up the family jalopy and while arguing about which road to take, crossed Moon River. That's a style too I suppose.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDddAKtELZ8
 
  • #296
:) lol. funny expression you used!
Yeah you should get it! I like it, its one of my favourites!
 
  • #297
I just saw it but didn't like it that much. While it was not a horrible movie, Holly Golightly is no Eliza Doolittle. I have mixed feelings about Mickey Rooney playing a Japanese with the stereotypical jutting teeth. He's a great actor of course, and he did what he could with the part, but since the character never did anything Japanese, he may as well have played a white. Japanese don't take soap into the tub. They wash and rinse outside the tub and enter it clean.
 
  • #298
You may be good, or i may be rubbish.
 
  • #299
Jimmy Snyder said:
I just saw it but didn't like it that much. While it was not a horrible movie, Holly Golightly is no Eliza Doolittle. I have mixed feelings about Mickey Rooney playing a Japanese with the stereotypical jutting teeth. He's a great actor of course, and he did what he could with the part, but since the character never did anything Japanese, he may as well have played a white. Japanese don't take soap into the tub. They wash and rinse outside the tub and enter it clean.

yeah, that bit is quite racist. that's the only bad bit for me. I like it cos she's so pretty and charming! and its so heartwarming!
 
  • #300
Have we given up on the last one?
 
Back
Top