Position vector for anti-clockwise circular motion derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the position vector for a particle in uniform anti-clockwise circular motion, specifically the equation \(\vec r(t) = (-R\sin(\omega t), R\cos(\omega t))\). The initial assumption was that the motion started from the positive x-axis, which led to confusion when compared to lecture notes that indicated a start from the positive y-axis. Clarifications were made regarding the polar coordinate system and the significance of the starting point in determining the position vector. Participants emphasized the importance of visualizing the motion represented by the equations to better understand the derivation process. The conversation concluded with an acknowledgment of the need to align assumptions with the specified conditions in the lecture materials.
member 731016
Homework Statement
I am trying to derive the equation for a particle in uniform anti-clockwise circular motion. According to the lecture notes, this equation is ##\vec r(t) = (-Rsin(\omega t), Rcos(\omega t))##
Relevant Equations
##\omega = \frac{d\theta}{dt}##
##\vec r(t) = (-Rsin(\omega t), Rcos(\omega t))##
To derive ##\vec r (t)=(−Rsin(ωt),Rcos(ωt)) ##

I start by integrating ##ω=\frac{dθ}{dt}## to get ##θ_f=θ_i+ωt##.

Therefore since ##Δθ=θ## by definition since the angular displacement is always taken with respect to some initial reference line, then ##θ_f−θ_i=θ## , thus, ##\theta = \omega t##.

Therefore, from ##x = r\cos\theta## we get ##x = r\cos\omega t## and for ##y = r\sin\theta = r\sin\omega t## which gives our position vector to be ##\vec r(t) = (r\cos\omega t, r\sin\omega t)##.

However, this is incorrect when compared to the lecture notes. Does someone please know what I did wrong here?

Here is a picture of the physical setup.
1691398652289.png


Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the start point (position when ##t = 0##). The equation in the lecture notes uses a different start point to yours.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
ChiralSuperfields said:
with respect to some initial reference line
There is the polar coordinate system ##r,\theta,## where ##\theta = 0## is along the positive ##x##-axis.

So that $$\vec r(t) = (-R\sin\omega t, R\cos\omega t)$$ describes a position as a function of time with ##\vec r(0) = (0, 1)##, i.e. starting on the positive ##y##-axis. The time derivative is $$\dot{\vec r} (t) = (-\omega R\cos\omega t, \omega R\sin\omega t)$$ So at ##t=0## the motion is to the left, counter clockwise.

[edit]ah, slow typist...

note: use \cos and \sin and no brackets in ##\LaTeX##
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and Lnewqban
Steve4Physics said:
Consider the start point (position when ##t = 0##). The equation in the lecture notes uses a different start point to yours.
BvU said:
There is the polar coordinate system ##r,\theta,## where ##\theta = 0## is along the positive ##x##-axis.

So that $$\vec r(t) = (-R\sin\omega t, R\cos\omega t)$$ describes a position as a function of time with ##\vec r(0) = (0, 1)##, i.e. starting on the positive ##y##-axis. The time derivative is $$\dot{\vec r} (t) = (-\omega R\cos\omega t, \omega R\sin\omega t)$$ So at ##t=0## the motion is to the left, counter clockwise.

[edit]ah, slow typist...

note: use \cos and \sin and no brackets in ##\LaTeX##
Thank you for your help @Steve4Physics and @BvU!

I think I understand now. Yeah, the lecture notes did not specify where the uniform circular motion started, so I assumed it started on the positive x-axis by convention. However, I will try to derive the position equation for the motion starting at the positive y-axis.

Many thanks!
 
ChiralSuperfields said:
the lecture notes did not specify where the uniform circular motion started, so I assumed it started on the positive x-axis by convention.
ChiralSuperfields said:
Homework Statement: I am trying to derive the equation for a particle in uniform anti-clockwise circular motion. According to the lecture notes, this equation is ##\vec r(t) = (-Rsin(\omega t), Rcos(\omega t))##
The first thing I did when seeing your thread start today was to try to visualize the motion expressed by that equation. So that pretty quickly led me to the non-standard starting point.

IMO, it's good to get in the habit of visualizing the motion expressed by an equation when you first see it. It gets easier as you do it more and more often, and helps to get your mind right for working the rest of the problem. :smile:

Edit/Add -- Part of being able to visualize something like this quickly is to have memorized what sin and cos functions look like, especially around zero as an argument, and how that relates to motion around the unit circle.

1691444832333.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mplwp_sin_cos_tan_piaxis.svg

1691444955075.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics, member 731016 and Lnewqban
berkeman said:
The first thing I did when seeing your thread start today was to try to visualize the motion expressed by that equation. So that pretty quickly led me to the non-standard starting point.

IMO, it's good to get in the habit of visualizing the motion expressed by an equation when you first see it. It gets easier as you do it more and more often, and helps to get your mind right for working the rest of the problem. :smile:

Edit/Add -- Part of being able to visualize something like this quickly is to have memorized what sin and cos functions look like, especially around zero as an argument, and how that relates to motion around the unit circle.

View attachment 330249
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mplwp_sin_cos_tan_piaxis.svg

View attachment 330250
Thank you for your help @berkeman ! Good idea to try to visualize the motion.

Many thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top