Positioning one's self for Industry-funded PhD

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations of pursuing an industry-funded PhD in Mechanical Engineering, particularly focusing on the dynamics between academia and industry collaborations. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding how to position oneself for such opportunities, the rarity of these funding arrangements, and the processes involved in securing a PhD through an employer-university partnership.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about strategies for positioning oneself for an industry-funded PhD, expressing uncertainty about how these opportunities arise and the roles of employers and advisors.
  • Some participants note that industry-funded PhDs are becoming increasingly rare, with most companies showing less interest in such arrangements.
  • Another participant describes the process in the UK and Europe, explaining that companies fund research projects at universities, which then independently select PhD candidates, maintaining academic integrity.
  • There is mention of historical practices in the USA where companies would fund employees' PhD research, but this is reportedly becoming less common.
  • A participant questions whether opportunities for industry-funded PhDs typically arise after gaining experience in a relevant job, suggesting that such arrangements may not be pre-planned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the current landscape of industry-funded PhDs, with some asserting their rarity while others provide insights into the processes involved. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach to securing such funding or the likelihood of success in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of academic integrity and the potential complications related to intellectual property in industry-funded research projects. There are also indications that the processes may vary significantly between regions, such as the USA and Europe.

dawin
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
TL;DR said:
Do you have any experience (direct or indirect) with industry/academia collaborations for pursuing a science PhD (MechE is the one I'm referencing specifically). How did you or someone position themselves to work that out?

I have a BS in MechE, and work in R&D. I've been plugging away at my MS in MechE, about halfway through, and have been considering that a PhD may really be more intellectually and personally what I want.

I've spoken to some old professors and friends with doctorates. I don't think I'm ready to commit fully to academia; I find working to be too fulfilling to give it up completely. Plus a mortgage doesn't help. Does anyone here have experience (direct or indirect) with getting a PhD through an employer/university collaboration?

I'm somewhat at a loss of how these things come up. I work at a small company, and don't think they'd be supportive. How does one position themselves into a situation conducive to the above? Does the employer come first? Advisor? Did you, or someone you know, go in with that goal known or did it come up after they started?

Right now I have a smattering of experiences, but mostly with composites (design and analysis). Through school, personal interest, and some work projects my real interests actually lies more in structural dynamics/controls. Not sure if that muddies the waters at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those kinds of industry-funded Ph.Ds are getting rarer and rarer. Most companies just aren't interested anymore. The only people I know who have done them worked either for National Labs or the Areospace/Defense industry.
 
From my experience in the UK and Europe, it doesn't work the way that you imply. The company funds the university to do a research project. The university decides whether that project is suitable for one or more PhDs (with the agreement of the company, since there may be intellectual property issues because the PhD thesis will finish up in the public domain).

The university then selects the PhD student completely independent from the company - i.e. the university has full control over the academic integrity of awarding the PhD.

Of course the PhD candidate may use the opportunity to network with the sponsoring company and eventually be offered a job there, but that isn't guaranteed.

The process in the USA be different of course, but one might expect the basic issue of academic integrity is the same - i.e. a company can't "buy" a PhD for one of its own employees.
 
AlephZero said:
From my experience in the UK and Europe, it doesn't work the way that you imply. The company funds the university to do a research project. The university decides whether that project is suitable for one or more PhDs (with the agreement of the company, since there may be intellectual property issues because the PhD thesis will finish up in the public domain).

The university then selects the PhD student completely independent from the company - i.e. the university has full control over the academic integrity of awarding the PhD.

Of course the PhD candidate may use the opportunity to network with the sponsoring company and eventually be offered a job there, but that isn't guaranteed.

The process in the USA be different of course, but one might expect the basic issue of academic integrity is the same - i.e. a company can't "buy" a PhD for one of its own employees.

The company typically doesn't "buy" a Ph.D. Historically it was common in the USA for a company to fund an employee's Ph.D. research (and pay them a salary). The student and the student's advisor chose the research, the company just paid the student and tuition.

This was a great deal indeed for the student but is getting less and less common these days.
 
carlgrace said:
Those kinds of industry-funded Ph.Ds are getting rarer and rarer. Most companies just aren't interested anymore. The only people I know who have done them worked either for National Labs or the Areospace/Defense industry.

Is this something that presented itself to them AFTER they worked for some time at the lab, available to anyone and they took it, started work there with that as a pretense?
 
And thanks to both of you for your responses!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K