Possible Proof of Time Travel: Is it Physically Possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the skepticism surrounding the possibility of time travel, specifically referencing a video that allegedly shows a time traveler in 1910 using a cell phone. Participants argue that the notion of a time traveler using a modern device in a historical context lacks scientific validity. Key points include the necessity of cell towers for cell phone functionality and the implausibility of a time traveler communicating in a time devoid of such technology. The consensus is that the evidence presented does not substantiate claims of time travel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to time and space.
  • Familiarity with the concept of causality in scientific discussions.
  • Knowledge of telecommunications technology, specifically how cell phones operate.
  • Critical thinking skills to evaluate claims and evidence.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific theories of time travel, including Einstein's theory of relativity.
  • Explore the technological requirements for modern telecommunications, focusing on cell tower infrastructure.
  • Investigate historical context and technological advancements of the early 20th century.
  • Learn about logical fallacies and critical thinking techniques to assess extraordinary claims.
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in physics, science enthusiasts, skeptics of extraordinary claims, and anyone looking to enhance their critical thinking skills regarding technological and historical assertions.

Physics news on Phys.org
Oh my gawd. Turn on your critical thinking.

What's more logical, a time traveler walking around the set of a 1910 holding a cell phone, or people interpreting a vague hand gesture to be something it isn't simply because we see it 50 times a day in our average lives.
 
Also, if there were such a man in 1910, who would he be talking to on a cell phone that couldn't possibly work?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread 'Does acceleration affect impact energy vs constant velocity?'

I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...
View full post »

Similar threads

High School Need help with understanding time travel
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad Time travel is a fact or fiction.?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Is time real (in a physical sense)?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
High School Is airspeed irrelevant in determining airplane travel time?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
High School How do physicists know that the past is immutable?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad Higher Dimensional Time Implications?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
High School Time Travel: Is it Physically Possible? | Scientific American
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
High School How Does Time Travel Influence Aging?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Entropy Real? End of Time? - Veritasium Video
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
High School Nalini Joshi's Time Travel Ideas
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K