Graduate Possible Ways to reduce Electron field Emission threshold

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on reducing the electric field required for electron tunneling, specifically questioning why calculated values using the Schottky-Nordheim approach (870 kV/mm) differ significantly from measured values (250 kV/mm). The inquiry includes considerations of work function, surface roughness, and space charges. Participants are asked to clarify whether the emission occurs into free space or between conductors, as this context could influence the results. The conversation highlights the need for understanding the mechanisms behind these discrepancies in high voltage applications. Overall, the thread seeks insights into the factors affecting electron field emission thresholds.
domovinavi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

i wanted to ask if anyone knows a process or mechanism, that reduces the electric field that is requiered to tunnel an electron. When i use the work function of 4 eV (Aluminum) i get with Schottky-Nordheim approach a field of 870 kV/mm to tunnel an electron. Measurements tho just get in the best case to 250 kV/mm, also including calculations for surface roughness and space charges. Does anyone have an idea what the possible reason is for this behaviour?Context: breakdown measurements of high voltage applications
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain a bit more. Is this emission into free space or between conductors?
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
10K