I Postive rays in cathode ray tube experiments?

Click For Summary
Positive rays in cathode ray tube experiments consist of ions, specifically atoms that are missing one or more electrons. Unlike negative rays, which are made up of electrons, positive rays cannot be positrons due to the low energy and simplicity of the equipment used. In typical setups containing air, these positive ions are primarily nitrogen and oxygen. The discussion highlights that a magnet does not deflect these heavier positive rays, indicating their distinct properties compared to electrons. Overall, the positive rays are identified as ions resulting from the ionization of gases within the tube.
sol47739
Messages
38
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
I have some questions about the cathode ray experiments they did back in history and what the positive rays consist of about which I read in a book.
I read in the following book A history of the sciences by Stephen F. Mason. About the discovery of the electron the write what I attached in the picture.

I wonder what do these positive rays traveling in the opposite direction they talk about consist of? Some ions or what? I understand that the negative rays consist of electrons but positive rays? I can’t understand that it could be positrons since these cathode ray tubes are such simple equipment and at low energies that no positrons can appear. But what do they consist of? And what are they referring to?
 

Attachments

  • bild.png
    bild.png
    105.7 KB · Views: 155
Physics news on Phys.org
They are ions; atoms missing one or more electrons. If it was Hydrogen gas then you could call them protons, otherwise it takes way too much energy to break apart the nucleus of an atom for these guys to have done.
 
  • Like
Likes sol47739 and tech99
The tube would usually contain air, so positive ions of nitrogen and oxygen will be formed. I happened to find a de-mountable tube, vacuum pump and 5 kV power supply at a school where I worked and we did the experiment. A magnet does not deflect the heavy positive rays.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K