Potential and Kinetic Energy Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the gravitational potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) of a softball thrown straight up. The PE at the highest point is calculated to be 59.584 J, but there is confusion about determining KE without knowing the velocity. Participants suggest using conservation of energy principles, noting that KE equals PE at the moment of release and when the ball returns to the thrower. Kinematic equations are also mentioned as a method to find velocity using distance and acceleration due to gravity. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that KE and PE are interconnected through energy conservation, allowing for calculations based on known values.
CeceBear
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You throw a softball (of mass 400g) straight up into the air. It reaches a maximum altitude of 15.2m and then returns to you.
What is the gravitational potential energy of the softball at its highest position? Assume the ball departed from and returned to ground level.
Assume no energy is lost by the softball while it is in the air.
What is the kinetic energy of the softball as soon as it leaves your hand?
What is the kinetic energy of the softball when it returns to your hand?
What is the speed of the ball?


Homework Equations


PE = mgh
KE = (1/2)mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I've already calculated the PE to be 59.584 J. I'm not sure how to calculate KE without a velocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can try using the conservation of energy principle. Or use the kinematic motion equations. Have you tried either method?
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can try using the conservation of energy principle. Or use the kinematic motion equations. Have you tried either method?

But I only have distance. I don't have time, acceleration, or velocity for the kinematic equations. And according to the conservation of energy law, wouldn't KE just be -PE?
 
I think you are forgetting one more equation
total energy: KE+PE
so you can try setting up like this using conservation of energy
Initial Total Energy=Final Total Energy

as for kinematic equations, you do have acceleration. You can figure out velocity by finding time it takes to reach the top or fall to the ground using kinematics
funny I just had a question about Conservation of energy as well >_>...starting a new thread..

wouldn't KE just be -PE?
KE would equal to PE (not -PE) but this depends on when you are talking about. (it would be true if use KE when PE=0 and PE when KE=0)
 
Last edited:
Ok, I think I've got it now. Thank you very much!
 
Using the known distance, gravity, and the fact that its velocity is zero at its highest point you can find its final velocity
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top