Potential at center of polyhedron = average of potential on surface

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The potential at the center of a regular polyhedron, bounded by conducting surfaces at different potentials \( V_i \) (where \( i = 1, 2, 3, \ldots, n \)), is equal to the average of the potentials on the surfaces. This conclusion is derived using Dirichlet boundary conditions as outlined in Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (3rd ed., #2.28). The solution involves applying the Green's function method, where the normal derivative of the Green's function at the center simplifies the evaluation of the surface integral, confirming that the center potential is indeed the average of the surface potentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirichlet boundary conditions in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with Green's functions and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of potential theory in electrostatics
  • Ability to perform surface integrals in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Green's functions in electrostatics
  • Learn about Neumann boundary conditions and their implications
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of potential in closed geometries
  • Investigate the properties of regular polyhedra in electrostatic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, mathematical physics, and potential theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of boundary value problems in electrostatics.

camron_m21
Messages
8
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A closed volume is bounded by conducting surfaces that are the n sides of a regular polyhedron (n = 4,6,8,...). The n surfaces are at different potentials Vi, i = 1,2,3,...,n. Prove that the potential at the center of the polyhedron is the average of the potential on the n sides. (Jackson, 3rd ed., #2.28)

Homework Equations



Dirichlet boundary conditions: (Eqn 1)
\Phi(x)= \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int_{V}\rho(x')G(x,x')d3x' - \frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{S}\Phi(x')\frac{\partial G}{\partial n'}da'

where V is the volume enclosed by the surfaces S, and G is the Green's function.

Neumann boundary conditions: (Eqn 2)
\Phi(x) = \left\langle\Phi\right\rangle_{S} + \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\int_{V}\rho(x')G(x,x')d^{3}x' + \frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{S}\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial n'}G(x,x')da'

where \left\langle\Phi\right\rangle_{S} is the average value of the potential over the surface S.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think this should be fairly easy to solve, and I have some idea of how to do it using either eqn 1 or 2. Since we know the potential on the surfaces, my initial thought was to use eqn 1, since we have Dirichlet boundary conditions. There are no charges in V, so the first integral is zero, but I'm not sure what to do with the normal derivative of the Green's function in the second derivative. We're evaluating it at the center, which we can place at the origin, so it would be G(0,x'). It would be nice if this were just unity, since then we'd have the average over the surface of the potential, which is what we want.

My other idea was to use eqn 2, which I'm not sure I can do since we're give the potential and not the field. BUT if I use that, then the first integral is zero due to no charge in V, and the second integral is zero since the potential is constant on each of the surfaces so the derivative would be zero (I think. Not sure that's true.) If all of that is valid, then we're just left with the average potential over the surface, and that's it.

My question: are either of these the right way to go, or is there something I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I figured it out; I reread the section in Jackson on Green's functions. I won't write out the full solution, but the general way to solve this is to use the Dirichlet formula, and to break up the surface integral into a sum over all the individual faces. Then realize that G(0,x') is the potential at a location x' of a 'unit' point charge at the origin, with all the surfaces at zero potential, and thus its normal derivative gives the induced charge density. From there the integral is pretty easy to evaluate. Hopefully this helps someone.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
733
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K