Potential energy and turning points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving potential energy and turning points, specifically concerning a block sliding on a frictionless loop track. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum height from which the block can start to successfully complete the loop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents two different approaches to the problem, leading to different conclusions regarding the minimum height. Some participants question the assumptions made about the velocity at the top of the loop and suggest that further analysis of forces is necessary. Others discuss the implications of energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and questioning each other's reasoning. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or answer, but some guidance has been provided regarding the need to consider forces at the top of the loop.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of energy conservation principles and the assumptions about initial conditions, such as starting from rest. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their solutions, and some participants mention previous experiences with similar problems.

nightshade123
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] potential energy and turning points

Homework Statement


A block slides on the frictionless loop the lopp track shown in this img, what is the min height at which it can start from rest and still make it around the loop

46.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


I haev solved this problem TWO ways, and i can't decide which way is correct

the eqn...

U0+K0 = K+U
where U = potential energy and K = kinetic energy
first

m * g * h + (1/2) * m * v^2 >= m * g * 2 * R

final answer = h = 2R
the other way is

m * g * h >= (1/2) * m * v^2 + m * g * 2 * R

final answer is h = (5*R) / 2??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
if i am way off let me kno, thx
 
Last edited:
What are you assuming v to be? 0?

I don't think the answer is just 2R. You have to do some analysis on the forces, since at the top, the normal force should be zero, and you find the velocity for which that is required. If velocity were zero at the top, it wouldn't make it around the loop, just fall off.

The 5/2 R answer looks correct.
 
Last edited:
you can solve the problem for velocity and plug the velocity function in and solve for h, and that is how you derive the formula, and for the 2R velocity cancels out so that wouldn't make sense, thanks
 
can someone else sovle the two equations i listed at the top of the page and tell me if they got the same thing, i keep solving the 2nd one and getting h=h-2R+2R which is saying the min height is the min height of the radius...
 
Last edited:
well you are starting from rest with U_i so it makes sense to me that what ever happens after would only be distributions of the energy between kintetic and potential so I would set the equation to what I am starting with
 
Last edited:
i just did this exact problem in my homework and got the correct answer but i don't kno how to help without breaking a forum rule and giving u the answer
 
dont worry about it i got it already, had to open a diffrent thread because the titel was wrong
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K