Potential inbetween two coaxial cylinders

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for the electric potential between two coaxial cylindrical conductors, where the inner cylinder has radius 'a' and the outer cylinder has radius 'b'. The inner cylinder is maintained at a potential 'Vo', while the outer cylinder is grounded. The solution involves applying Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates, leading to the potential function V(r) = Vo/[ln(a/b)] * ln(r/b) for the region a ≤ r ≤ b. The solution is confirmed using Gauss' theorem, ensuring its correctness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of Gauss' theorem in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore boundary value problems in electrostatics
  • Learn about the applications of Gauss' theorem in electrostatics
  • Investigate the implications of potential differences in cylindrical geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on electrostatics and potential theory, will benefit from this discussion.

aftershock
Messages
106
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are 2 coaxial cylindrical conductors. The inner cylinder has radius a, while the outer cylinder has radius b. There is no charge in the region a < r < b. If the inner cylinder is at potential Vo and the outer cylinder is grounded, we want to find the potential in the region between the cylinders. We assume L >> b > a and neglect end effects.

a) Write Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates.

b) Assuming V(r) is a function of the axial distance r alone, integrate the differential equation and use the boundary conditions to find V(r) , a ≤ r ≤ b.



Homework Equations



2V = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates would be

(1/r)(d/dr)(r*dV/dr) =0

Since there is no phi or z dependence. Also I know it's a partial and not d but I can't type the symbol.

To solve this

(1/r)(d/dr)(r*dV/dr) =0

(d/dr)(r*dV/dr) =0

r*dV/dr = C

dV/dr = C/r

dV = C/r dr

V = C*ln(r) + K , where C and K are constants.

Using the boundary conditions:

0 = C*ln(b) + K

Vo = C*ln(a) + K

and using that to solve for constants:

V = Vo/[ln(a/b)] * ln(r/b)

Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The result is correct and the other parts look fine, too.

LaTeX code can be used to write partial derivatives: ##[/color]\frac{\partial}{\partial r}##[/color] --> ##\frac{\partial}{\partial r}##.
 
aftershock said:

Homework Statement



V = Vo/[ln(a/b)] * ln(r/b)

Is that right?

Confirmed using Gauss' theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K