Potential of a Solid Charged Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total potential energy of a uniformly charged solid sphere with a given radius and charge. Participants explore the implications of the potential both inside and outside the sphere, as well as the associated energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential inside and outside the sphere, questioning the validity of the formulas used. There are attempts to derive the potential energy and clarify the integration process for electric fields. Some participants express confusion about the signs of the potential energy and the continuity of potential at the boundary of the sphere.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the potential and potential energy inside and outside the sphere. Some participants have provided guidance on integrating electric fields and the implications of constants in potential calculations. Multiple interpretations of the results are being considered, particularly regarding the energy stored inside versus outside the sphere.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of boundary conditions and the requirement that potential approaches zero at infinity. There is also mention of specific homework constraints and the need to adhere to the definitions provided in the problem statement.

jmtome2
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sphere of radius 'a' contains a charge Q, uniformly distributed throughout it's volume. Calculate the total potential energy of this configuration.


Homework Equations


[tex]U=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau[/tex]

with [tex]\rho[/tex]=charge density
and [tex]V[/tex]=potential


The Attempt at a Solution


Potential of a Charged Sphere is [tex]V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}[/tex]
Uniform Charge Density of a Sphere is [tex]\rho=\frac{Q}{Vol}=\frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi\cdot a^{3}}[/tex]

Therefore our equation becomes:
[tex]U=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\left(\frac{Q}{\frac{4}{3}\pi\cdot a^{3}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\right) \int \frac{1}{r}d\tau[/tex]

In spherical coordinates, [tex]d\tau=r^2sin(\theta)drd\theta\d\phi[/tex]

[tex]U=\frac{Q^2}{\frac{32}{3}\pi^2\espilon_0\cdot a^3} \int^{a}_{0} rdr \int^{\pi}_{0} sin(\theta) d\theta \int^{2\pi}_{0} d\phi[/tex]

Final: [tex]U=\left(\frac{3}{16}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This result looks a little bizarre to me... did I miss anything?
 
jmtome2 said:
Potential of a Charged Sphere is [tex]V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}[/tex]

Is it really? Even inside the sphere?
 
Potential of a Solid Charged Sphere Inside: [tex] V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}[/tex]

i think...
 
Don't guess, calculate...what is the field inside and outside a uniformly charged sphere?
 
OK i got the problem worked out, thanks... one question left tho, I get a negative number for the potential and, therefore a negative result for the potential energy

[tex] V_{in}=\frac{-Q\cdot r^{2}}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}}[/tex]

and

[tex] U_{in}=-\left(\frac{3}{80}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)[/tex]

Does it make sense that the potnetial energy inside is negative?
 
You seem to be missing a constant term in your potential. In most cases, adding or subtracting a constant doesn't matter, but the formula you are using for [itex]U[/itex] assumes that the potential goes to zero at infinity...
 
I thought about the constant term and realized that the potential needs to go to 0 as r goes to infinity, but noticed 2 things...

Firstly, no constant is going to be able to compesate for fact that V_in has to go to infinity as r goes to inifinity

Secondly, the problem later goes on to state that the outside potential energy is five times the potential energy of the inside, which is the result that we get if no constant is added to V_in after integration of E

So... what do you suggest? Maybe there's some way to justify this result or...?
 
jmtome2 said:
Firstly, no constant is going to be able to compesate for fact that V_in has to go to infinity as r goes to inifinity

Of course not! Vin is only defined for [itex]r\leq a[/itex], but Vout must go to zero as [itex]r\to\infty[/itex], and the potential must be continuous at [itex]r=a[/itex]
 
  • #10
that last condition must imply then that the inside potential must be positive, but how can this be since E_in is positive and is the negative gradient of V_in?
 
  • #11
The gradient of a constant is zero, so adding a constant will not affect the field, even if the constant is large enough to make the potential positive...

What diid you get for the field inside and out? What do you get when you integrate it?

[tex]V_{\text{in}}(r)=-\int_{\infty}^r\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{s}=-\int_{\infty}^a\textbf{E}_\text{{out}}\cdot d\textbf{s}-\int_{a}^r\textbf{E}_{\text{in}}\cdot d\textbf{s}[/tex]

The first term corresponds to your constant!:wink:
 
  • #12
Ok...

For E_in, i get...
[tex] E_{in}=\frac{Q\cdot r}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}}[/tex]

Integrating, for V_in, i get...
[tex] V_{in}=\int^{r}_{0}\frac{Q\cdot r}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}} dr[/tex]

and therefore,...
[tex] V_{in}=\frac{Q\cdot r^{2}}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a^{3}} + C[/tex]
 
  • #13
Why are you integrating from zero to [itex]r[/itex]? And why are you just adding a constant on the end of a definite integral like that?

If your reference point is at infinity, the you need to integrate from infinity to [itex]r[/itex] as shown in my previous post.
 
  • #14
So I get that

[tex] V_{in}=\frac{Q}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}\right)[/tex]

I like where this is going :)
 
  • #15
Last question?

So final V_in and V_out are:

[tex] V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0\cdot r}[/tex]

and

[tex] V_{in}=\frac{Q}{8\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\left(3-\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}\right)[/tex]

Which fixes the continuity of V problem that I had earlier when r=a.


Now upon calculating U_in and U_out, i get:

[tex] U_{out}=\left(\frac{3}{16}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)[/tex]

and

[tex] U_{out}=\left(\frac{3}{20}\right)\left(\frac{Q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0\cdot a}\right)[/tex]

However, at the end of the problem, it states that "there is five times more energy outside than inside". I'm I not calculating the energy stored inside and outside correctly?
 
  • #16
The integral,

[tex]U=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau[/tex]

gives the total potential energy of the distribution (Remember, [itex]\rho[/itex] is zero outside the sphere, so using this formula to calculate the energy stored in the fields outside the sphere makes no sense at all!)

If you are asked to find the energy stored in the fields inside and out, you'll want to use

[tex]U=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int E^2 d\tau[/tex]

You should of course find that

[tex]U_{in}+U_{out}=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho V d\tau[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Thank you! It all works out and makes sense! I found that equation hiding at the end of section 2.4.3 in Griffith's right before I got your response but you clarified it perfectly... Feels so good to see the big picture after drudging through this all day
 
  • #18
Thank you! It all works out and makes sense! I found that equation hiding at the end of section 2.4.3 in Griffith's right before I got your response but you clarified it perfectly... Feels so good to see the big picture after drudging through this all day
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K