Power series, radius of convergence and Abel's Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of power series, specifically the series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n\) with radius of convergence \(R\). It establishes that for \(R \in \mathbb{R} - \{0\}\), the limit as \(x\) approaches \(R^{-}\) can be evaluated using Abel's Theorem. The conversation also addresses the case when \(R = \pm \infty\), concluding that these values are not real numbers and thus do not apply to the convergence of the series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power series and their convergence properties
  • Familiarity with Abel's Theorem in analysis
  • Knowledge of limits and uniform convergence
  • Basic concepts of real numbers and intervals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Abel's Theorem in different contexts
  • Explore the behavior of power series at the boundaries of their radius of convergence
  • Learn about uniform convergence and its applications in analysis
  • Investigate the concept of convergence at infinity in series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, as well as educators and researchers interested in the properties of power series and convergence theorems.

fmam3
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose the series \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n has radius of convergence R and converges at x = R. Prove that \lim_{x \to R^{-}}\large( \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} a_n x^n \large) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \large( \lim_{x \to R^{-}} a_n x^n \large)


2. Question
For the case R \in \mathbb{R}-\{0\} (i.e. the radius of convergence is a finite nonzero real number), then the above is a straight forward application of Abel's Theorem on the LHS, and an easy application of the fact that x^n is a continuous function on \mathbb{R} on the RHS. If R = 0, then the result is trivial.

However, my question is how do you (or do you even) deal with the case R = \pm \infty? That is, do we even say that the power series converges at x = R = \pm \infty?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. \pm \infty isn't a real number.

Say x = x' is an interior point in the interval of convergence (we can assume x' is positive without any loss of generality), then the series converges uniformly for x' and the theorem you proved follows trivially from Abel's theorem. But if R = \infty then you can always find a value x'' > x' so that x' is an interior point in the interval [0, x''] and so the series converges uniformly for x' and so your theorem follows again for x'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K