dextercioby said:
1.Factor the denominator:
[tex]\frac{1}{n^{2}+2n}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+2}})[/tex] (1)
Write your series like:
[tex]S(x)=\frac{1}{2}(\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n}-\sum_{n=1}^{+\infty} \frac{x^{n}}{n+2})[/tex]
You're moving terms in a conditionally convergent sequence which is not always kosher. Specifically, in this case, if [itex]x=1[/itex] the original series is convergent, while yours is not.
I can suggest an alternative approach:
As you pointed out:
[tex]\frac{1}{n^{2}+2n}=\frac{1}{2}(\frac{x^n}{n}-\frac{x^n}{n+2}})[/tex]
This looks suspicously like a telescoping sum. Let's take a look at partial sums
[tex]S(x,k)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=1}^{k}\left(\frac{x^n}{n}-\frac{x^n}{n+2}}\right)[/tex]
In the [itex]x=1[/itex] this is very nice:
[tex]S(1,k)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\left(\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{3}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{5}\right)+...\left(\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+2}\right)\right)[/tex]
Now, the negative
[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]
from the first term will cancel with the positve
[itex]\frac{1}{3}[/itex]
from the 3rd term. Similarly, for the negative elements in each of the following terms except for the last two. This means that the sum telescopes to:
[tex]S(1,k)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{1}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{k+1}-\frac{1}{k+2}\right)[/tex]
so
[tex]S(1)=\frac{3}{4}[/tex]
It's pretty obvious that for [itex]|x|<1[/itex] the series are absolutely convergent (so Dex's approach will work) and for [tex]|x|>1[/tex] the series will be divergent since the individual terms will grow without bound.