Undergrad Practical cosmic speed limit for macroscopic objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
BWV
Messages
1,603
Reaction score
1,956
as far as I can find, the rotational velocity of neutron stars is the fastest observed speed of a macroscopic object

Wondering about an upper limit to the velocity of macroscopic (say 1 gram or more) projectiles based on known physical processes. I.e. it’s not physically impossible for an asteroid-size object to travel at .9c, but guessing no known process could accelerate it to that speed - a burst of energy like a supernova would just obliterate it.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Interesting thought .... I think we have to invoke the help of an advanced ET race who could construct a linear accelerator many light years long electromagnetically accelerating an object , but then there's the issue of drag from "vacum " of space , which is not a complete vacum... even so should get to about .99c
 
BWV said:
as far as I can find, the rotational velocity of neutron stars is the fastest observed speed of a macroscopic object

Wondering about an upper limit to the velocity of macroscopic (say 1 gram or more) projectiles based on known physical processes. I.e. it’s not physically impossible for an asteroid-size object to travel at .9c, but guessing no known process could accelerate it to that speed - a burst of energy like a supernova would just obliterate it.
Sling shot? If the star was large enough that could accelerate an object, more so for a black hole, I am guessing you would already have to travelling at a very high velocity to reach significant % of c.
 
IIRC it would take a year to accelerate 1kg at 1g to 0.9C. There is a calculator on line for this.
 
pinball1970 said:
Sling shot? If the star was large enough that could accelerate an object, more so for a black hole, I am guessing you would already have to travelling at a very high velocity to reach significant % of c.
It looks like an upper limit for the slingshot is 2x the orbital velocity, messing around with Gemini and the vis-viva equation it does look possible for a massive object orbiting just outside of the event horizon of a black hole to reach relativistic speeds - as high as .05C then an object slingshotted off of it could reach an even higher velocity
 
Note you need at least two orbiting massive objects for a (normal) gravitational slingshot, not just one, in order for a test particle to gain speed relative to the common center of mass.

For maximum effect, one could image a pebble falling with high relative speed towards a pair of black holes orbiting each other very close (nearly at contact), but I am not aware if there is an easy way to quantify the speed change which would include relevant (i.e. significant) relativistic effects.
 
UC Berkely, December 16, 2025 https://news.berkeley.edu/2025/12/16/whats-powering-these-mysterious-bright-blue-cosmic-flashes-astronomers-find-a-clue/ AT 2024wpp, a luminous fast blue optical transient, or LFBOT, is the bright blue spot at the upper right edge of its host galaxy, which is 1.1 billion light-years from Earth in (or near) a galaxy far, far away. Such objects are very bright (obiously) and very energetic. The article indicates that AT 2024wpp had a peak luminosity of 2-4 x...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
211
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K