Undergrad Precise intuition about limits and infinitesimals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the formal understanding of limits and infinitesimals in mathematics. The user seeks to explore the historical context of limits beyond basic definitions and to gain a deeper intuitive grasp of these concepts. Key resources mentioned include the YouTube series "Essence of Calculus" by 3blue1brown for visual understanding, and Jean Dieudonné's book on mathematical history from 1700 to 1900, alongside "Non-standard analysis" by Abraham Robinson for rigorous treatment of infinitesimals. The conversation emphasizes the importance of formal logic and definitions in modern mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, particularly limits.
  • Familiarity with formal logic and logical quantifiers.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical history, especially from 1700 to 1900.
  • Exposure to non-standard analysis and its implications for infinitesimals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Watch the "Essence of Calculus" YouTube series by 3blue1brown for visual insights on limits.
  • Read Jean Dieudonné's book on mathematical history for a deeper understanding of the evolution of limits.
  • Study "Non-standard analysis" by Abraham Robinson to grasp the rigorous treatment of infinitesimals.
  • Explore formal logic and its application in modern mathematics to enhance understanding of definitions and quantifiers.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, educators, and anyone interested in the historical and formal aspects of limits and infinitesimals in mathematics.

Sleek
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I've understood the formal definition of limits and its various applications. However, I'm trying to dive more into the history of how the concept of limits were conceived (more than what Wikipedia tends to cover), and how to formally understand and visualise infinitesimals.

For example, I know that `0.999... = 1`, where both the LHS and RHS are the same numbers with different representations (there's a proof that uses limits). How can I formally understand this? What branch of mathematics can I start exploring, and what are the best resources to do it?

Also, what are some good resources on the history of limits and the technical understanding of something "tending to infinity but not infinity?"

On my background: I've done math heavily in my undergraduate studies and calculus is not a problem. However, I'm trying to get deep into making things that I've learned intuitive, and not just resort to manipulating symbols without complete understanding.

Please let me know if my question is a bit vague, I'll be happy to add more details.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an excellent book from Jean Dieudonné about the mathematical history between 1700 and 1900. The numbers are from its title, the content isn't as strict at its borders. Unfortunately I don't know of an English version, but it's really a good source, and as I find, exciting.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
It is possible to make infinitesimals rigorous. This is called "non-standard analysis", and is treated in the book "Non standard analysis" by Robinson.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
Sleek said:
How can I formally understand this? What branch of mathematics can I start exploring, and what are the best resources to do it?
Also, what are some good resources on the history of limits and the technical understanding of something "tending to infinity but not infinity?"

A formal and technical understanding of limits is a different goal than understanding the early history of these concepts. The early history of the concept of limits is primarily useful in intuitively understanding limits. To understand the formal concept of limits, you need to understand the "game" of modern mathematics. This involves understanding the use of formal logic and logical quantifiers - and the outlook that definitions mean what they say as opposed to being descriptions of things that already exist.

It would be nice if mathematical topics could be studied in a gentle way, starting from their historic roots and proceeding to modern treatments. However, this is a time consuming way to learn things and most expositions that take this approach assume you already appreciate modern mathematical formalism.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K