Predicting the Markets Using Chaos Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the possibility of predicting market behavior using chaos theory, exploring the implications of chaotic dynamics on prediction accuracy. Participants reference films that depict these concepts and engage in a broader examination of chaos theory and its application to non-linear systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while research can be conducted using chaos theory, fuzzy logic, neural networks, and genetic algorithms, achieving 100% accuracy in predictions is unlikely.
  • One participant emphasizes that chaos theory is a vague term and relates it to non-linear dynamics, arguing that non-linear systems can be used to model markets.
  • Another participant argues against the feasibility of predicting markets using chaos theory, citing the concept of sensitive dependence on initial conditions, which implies that small errors in initial conditions can lead to significant deviations over time.
  • References are made to the films "The Bank" and "Pi" as cultural touchpoints for discussing chaos theory and market prediction, with differing opinions on the quality and relevance of these films.
  • A participant mentions that the non-linear pendulum can be solved using elliptic integrals, adding a technical detail to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of chaos theory to market predictions, with some supporting the idea and others arguing against it based on the inherent limitations of chaotic systems. No consensus is reached on the effectiveness of chaos theory for this purpose.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in understanding chaos theory, particularly regarding the definitions and implications of non-linear dynamics. There are unresolved assumptions about the nature of market behavior and the role of chaotic systems in prediction.

aricho
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to predict the Markets using Chaos Theory? (or predict anything) If you have seen the aussie movie "the bank" you willl know that's what he does

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
its possible to do research in markets using chaos theory,fuzzy logic, neural nets, GAs...but to PREDICT 100% accuracy is another thing.
 
hmm

haha yer

Um...where can i find out more about this?
 
aricho said:
Is it possible to predict the Markets using Chaos Theory? (or predict anything) If you have seen the aussie movie "the bank" you willl know that's what he does

Thanks

There's also the movie Pi, it's pretty sketchy though.
 
hmm, "chaos theory" is such a vague term really. in essence it is non-linear dynamics, so it is arguably the study of any system whose equations are non-linear. there is more to it than that, obviously, but there is no reason that we cannot use the styudy of non-linear systems to model things like markets, indeed i believe they do.

if you're not familiar with linear and non-linear then let's have an example.

a pendulum is modeled by an equation

\ddot{\theta}=k\sin\theta

where \theta is the angle to the vertical of the "string" this is a nonlinear equation that we cannot solve so we linearize it and replace \sin\theta with \theta a linear equation we can solve. non-linear dynamics is essentially trying to study the harder equations without this approximating step,
 
aricho said:
Is it possible to predict the Markets using Chaos Theory? (or predict anything) If you have seen the aussie movie "the bank" you willl know that's what he does

Thanks

That's not going to work. It sounds cool I know and oh yea, to get a real rise with people mention "Mandelbrot" and fractals. If markets exhibit chaos then by the very nature of chaotic dynamics, we are forever doomed to accurately predict their long-term behavior because of the nature of "sensitive dependence on initial conditions": Chaotic systems exhibit this property and it means that no matter how accurate we are in estimating the initial conditions of a system, we will always be off by a slight error. In chaotic systems, these errors grow with time until their magnitudes become equal and exceed the quantity of that which is being measured. Thus, prediction past these points is no better than guessing. :smile:

Edit: Oh yea, Peitgen in "Chaos Theory" does a marvelous job of describing Chaos Theory and gives fine examples how sensitive dependence disrupts long-term prediction of chaotic systems at every turn. :smile:

Edit2: Oh yea, just for the record, the non-linear pendulum can be solved using elliptic integrals.
 
Last edited:
<i>There's also the movie Pi, it's pretty sketchy though.</i>

Sketchy? I guess I'm confused by your use of the term. I think it's an excellent movie, and would recommend it.
 
Sorry dude - "Pi" was a pretty bad movie geared toward impressing non-scientist, non-mathematician types. Low-budget, horrible acting, horrible effects, and pretentious script.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K