Preventing Corona Discharge from Wimshurst Machine

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around optimizing the performance of a Wimshurst machine by addressing issues related to corona discharge from sharp points on the device. Participants explore various methods to seal or mitigate these discharges, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of their designs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the presence of corona discharge from sharp points on their Wimshurst machine and seeks advice on sealing these points to improve performance.
  • Another suggests removing sharp points where possible and constructing a spherical cage to reduce corona discharge by increasing the effective radius of the conductor surface.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of beeswax as a sealing material, with one participant sharing their experience that beeswax has limitations such as a low melting point and potential conductivity issues.
  • Alternative suggestions include using non-conductive paints or adhesives, and exploring other insulating materials like art gums or shellacs.
  • One participant discusses the importance of electrode design and the matching of electrode sizes to optimize sparking efficiency, indicating that their previous design was inadequate.
  • A technical explanation is provided regarding the relationship between the curvature of conductive surfaces and electron emission, suggesting that larger radii reduce the voltage gradient and thus the likelihood of corona discharge.
  • Another participant proposes using conductive paint or metal foil to cover sharp points, thereby creating a larger equipotential surface to mitigate corona effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of approaches to addressing corona discharge, with no consensus on the best method. Some agree on the need to increase the radius of sharp points, while others propose different materials and techniques for sealing or insulating the machine.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various limitations and assumptions regarding materials and designs, such as the effectiveness of beeswax, the properties of different insulating substances, and the need for larger machines to achieve higher voltages. These factors remain unresolved within the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in building or optimizing Wimshurst machines, those exploring high-voltage generation techniques, and hobbyists engaged in experimental electrical engineering may find this discussion relevant.

jg21
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Trying to optimize efficiency of my DC generator. Losing charge from sharp points.
Hey all, new here. Just finished my first wimshurst machine and I’d consider it to be fairly AWESOME! Having a blast so far.
4443F699-0BD6-4F48-A572-7E01DDE039B3.jpeg

The thing is, I believe that given the parameters of my build (# of sectors 24, diameter 11”, etc) I’m not quite getting max voltage possible and I’ve confirmed this at night in the dark by watching for corona. And it’s somewhat obvious in the daytime to listening for crackling around the caps and combs.

My question is this:
GIVEN the fact that there are some sharp points on my machine that I can’t avoid retrospectively. How can I beat “seal” my machine from leaks?? I’m basically in search of some sorta liquid Kapton tape or something… will painting gobs of beeswax onto all the sharp points improve performance?

At night I can see discharge from various slightly sharp points/burrs/abrasions on the brass or solder joints. And also I can see a little discharge from the ends of the Leyden jar foil to the wooden base about 1” below since they’re open PVC tubes (ugh, now I know, should have sealed the bottom somehow)

Right now I get ~2” sparks in the late spring conditions here in the northeast.

DA6ADE34-8ADE-43DB-9C3F-3C5CD5406088.jpeg


I want to check before I go to town with beeswax or other, because once I apply that to things like the foil I won’t be able to safely remove it. If it’s actually conductive, then I will have totally ruined my machine… anyone have experience with this? How can I seal my leaky wimshurst?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and AlexB23
Physics news on Phys.org
jg21 said:
At night I can see discharge from various slightly sharp points/burrs/abrasions on the brass or solder joints.
Remove the sharp points where possible.

Make a spherical cage from round wire and attach it to enclose the point generating the corona. That will increase the virtual radius of the conductor surface, which will reduce the corona.
 
Baluncore said:
Remove the sharp points where possible.

Make a spherical cage from round wire and attach it to enclose the point generating the corona. That will increase the virtual radius of the conductor surface, which will reduce the corona.
What about the sharp points where NOT possible to remove? Like the top and bottom edge of the Leyden jar foil. Etc.
there must be some sorta protection I could paint/slather on to hold a higher voltage no?
 
jg21 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to optimize efficiency of my DC generator. Losing charge from sharp points.

will painting gobs of beeswax onto all the sharp points improve performance?
jg21 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to optimize efficiency of my DC generator. Losing charge from sharp points.

want to check before I go to town with beeswax or other, because once I apply that to things like the foil I won’t be able to safely remove it. If it’s actually conductive, then I will have totally ruined my machine… anyone have experience with this?
Yes, I have some experience operating quite old electronics that used beeswax as an insulator/packaging though not your particular device. Beeswax was a readily available product before plastics but had several shortcomings:
  • low melting point
  • impurities and varying water content
  • sticky surface that attracted lint
I never experimented with beeswax properties, per se, such as resistance and conductivity despite keeping bees at college. I do recommend using a less volatile substance on your generator.

Non-conductive paint or certain adhesives, collectively referred to as dope in early DIY 20th Century texts, might serve you better. I suggest testing trial substances on a mockup of your working device then comparing effects.

As beeswax has become pricey, consider other biological substances as insulators such as various art gums (from plants) and shellacs (from insects), if you want to preserve an old-timey solution. More modern solutions include acrylics with or without additives.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlexB23 and jg21
jg21 said:
Like the top and bottom edge of the Leyden jar foil.
That requires you bend a metal tube into a torus that will sit outside, on the end edge of the foil. It only needs to contact at one point.
It could be made from any convenient material, then painted with conductive paint, or covered with gold leaf which looks good and is very low cost.
 
Thanks for all the good input. In future builds I’ll try to incorporate more of those features from the get go (torus, round everything) but for this one I’ve rounded a fair amount of sharp points so it’s a good start.

Did some experimenting and found that my main source of lack-luster sparking was poor electrode design. I did not account for polarity swapping and so my big and small electrodes were only good 1/2 the time. On top of that the sizes of them were not optimal even when polarity was correct… I have ordered a few more size variations of balls to try out. Been reading up on breakdown voltage for different geometries because I’d like to calculate the optimal radii.

Anyone know the reason behind why the large and small balls must match the electron dense and sparse sides respectively?
 
jg21 said:
Anyone know the reason behind why the large and small balls must match the electron dense and sparse sides respectively?
The emission of electrons requires less potential than the emission of metal ions.
The flow of electrons is reduced by increasing the radius, so reducing the curvature of the conductive surface, since the voltage gradient near the surface is reduced.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermionic_emission
 
jg21 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to optimize efficiency of my DC generator. Losing charge from sharp points.

Hey all, new here. Just finished my first wimshurst machine and I’d consider it to be fairly AWESOME! Having a blast so far.
View attachment 345159
The thing is, I believe that given the parameters of my build (# of sectors 24, diameter 11”, etc) I’m not quite getting max voltage possible and I’ve confirmed this at night in the dark by watching for corona. And it’s somewhat obvious in the daytime to listening for crackling around the caps and combs.

My question is this:
GIVEN the fact that there are some sharp points on my machine that I can’t avoid retrospectively. How can I beat “seal” my machine from leaks?? I’m basically in search of some sorta liquid Kapton tape or something… will painting gobs of beeswax onto all the sharp points improve performance?

At night I can see discharge from various slightly sharp points/burrs/abrasions on the brass or solder joints. And also I can see a little discharge from the ends of the Leyden jar foil to the wooden base about 1” below since they’re open PVC tubes (ugh, now I know, should have sealed the bottom somehow)

Right now I get ~2” sparks in the late spring conditions here in the northeast.

View attachment 345160

I want to check before I go to town with beeswax or other, because once I apply that to things like the foil I won’t be able to safely remove it. If it’s actually conductive, then I will have totally ruined my machine… anyone have experience with this? How can I seal my leaky wimshurst?
Now these machines are pretty darn cool. Was obsessed with them as a teen in the mid-2010s, but never owned one cos electricity is dangerous. Maybe use electrical tape to seal the machine, but I am no expert. :)
 
Winding high voltage conductors with insulation tape will hide the problem, not stop it. You must cover the tape with a metal foil or a conductive paint, to reduce corona. The metal foil makes an equipotential with a larger radius.

There is a limit to the maximum possible voltage for any machine. Higher voltages, require bigger machines, with wider air gap separation, bigger spheres, and wires replaced with cylindrical cages or tubes.

You need to increase the radius of external electrical surfaces. One way is to paint sharp corners with conductive paint, until the points are covered by a more rounded bulb of metallic paint.

Cut halfway through a ping-pong ball. Paint it with conductive paint. Squeeze it to open the cut, then clip it onto a point of corona discharge.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE, AlexB23 and hutchphd
  • #10
jg21 said:
What about the sharp points where NOT possible to remove?
You could perhaps replace the foil with thicker sheeting. That could increase the radius of the (sanded) end edges pro-rata. Foil is convenient and readily available but aluminium sheet of any thickness is available and can be formed round a wooden bar (rolling pin?), Annealing is not difficult if the sheet you have is already stiff.

PS Congratulations on your project; very impressive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K