Primitive roots & Reduced residue system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of primitive roots and reduced residue systems in modular arithmetic, specifically concerning a prime number p. Participants explore the implications of the greatest common divisor (gcd) of k and p-1 on the formation of reduced residue systems mod p, addressing both theoretical proofs and specific cases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if gcd(k, p-1) = 1, then the set {1^k, 2^k, ..., (p-1)^k} forms a reduced residue system mod p.
  • Others propose that if {1^k, 2^k, ..., (p-1)^k} forms a reduced residue system mod p, then it follows that gcd(k, p-1) must equal 1.
  • One participant questions the definition of a reduced residue system and clarifies that it consists of integers that are relatively prime to n and not congruent modulo n.
  • There is a suggestion that if gcd(k, p-1) = d > 1, then the elements of the set may not be distinct, leading to the conclusion that they do not form a reduced residue system.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the order of a primitive root g mod p and its relationship to the elements of the residue system.
  • There are inquiries about the congruence of certain powers of g and how they relate to the elements in the residue system.
  • One participant mentions that g^(p-1)/2 can only equal ±1 mod p, indicating a subgroup structure that may affect the residue system.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to apply Fermat's theorem to determine specific congruences related to the primitive root and the residue system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of gcd(k, p-1) on the reduced residue system, with no consensus reached on the proof for part b. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific conditions under which the elements of the set may or may not form a reduced residue system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the proof for part b requires demonstrating that distinct elements in the set {1^k, 2^k, ..., (p-1)^k} can be congruent, but the exact method to show this is not agreed upon. There are also references to subgroup structures and the application of Fermat's theorem, which may introduce additional complexity to the discussion.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Let p be a prime.
a) If gcd(k,p-1)=1, then [tex]1^k, 2^k,..., (p - 1)^k[/tex] form a reduced residue system mod p.
b) If [tex]1^k, 2^k,..., (p - 1)^k[/tex] form a reduced residue system mod p, then gcd(k,p-1)=1.[/color]
=================================

I proved part a by first showing that each of [tex]1^k, 2^k,..., (p - 1)^k[/tex] is relatively prime to p.
And then I noted that since p is a prime, there exists a primitive root mod p, call it g, so [tex]g, g^2,...,g^{p - 1}[/tex] is a reduced residue system mod p. Then using this, I showed that if gcd(k,p-1)=1, then no two of [tex]1^k, 2^k,..., (p - 1)^k[/tex] are congruent to each other mod p. Thus, it is a reduced residue system mod p.

But now I'm stuck on proving part b[/color].
Euqivalently, for part b, we can prove that if gcd(k,p-1)≠1, then [tex]1^k, 2^k,..., (p - 1)^k[/tex] do NOT form a reduced residue system mod p. But I can't figure out how to prove this...

Any help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean a "reduced residue system"? g, g^2...g^(p-1) ARE the residue system by nature of a primitative root. You are talking about "p, a prime," you know.
 
A reduced residue system modulo n is a set of φ(n) integers such that each integer is relatively prime to n and no two are congruent modulo n. I proved all of these properties in part a.

"g, g^2...g^(p-1) ARE the residue system " <----yes, and I proved this in part a.

The problem is how to do part b?

Thanks for any help!
 
A primitive root g must be congruent mod p to one of the elements of the residue system. On the other hand what must be the order of g, mod p?
 
JSuarez said:
A primitive root g must be congruent mod p to one of the elements of the residue system. On the other hand what must be the order of g, mod p?

Since g is a primitive root mod p, the order of g (mod p) must be p-1, and we have gp-1=1(mod p)

In part b, we have to show that if gcd(k,p-1)=d>1[/color], then {1k,2k,...,(p-1)k} does NOT form a reduced residue system mod p. If we can show that some distinct elements in the set are congruent to each other, then we're done. But how to show this?

Can someone kindly help me, please? I'm still puzzled...
 
Last edited:
Correct, if g is a primitive root, then its order mod p is p-1 and you have:

[tex]g\equiv a^{k}\left(\rm{mod} p\right)[/tex]

For some [itex]a^k[/itex] in the residue set. Now, if d=gcd(k,p-1) [tex]g^\frac{p-1}{d}[/tex] is congruent to what mod p?
 
JSuarez said:
Correct, if g is a primitive root, then its order mod p is p-1 and you have:

[tex]g\equiv a^{k}\left(\rm{mod} p\right)[/tex]
Can you explain why this is true, please? This doesn't seem clear to me...
Also, what is "a"?



For some [itex]a^k[/itex] in the residue set. Now, if d=gcd(k,p-1) [tex]g^\frac{p-1}{d}[/tex] is congruent to what mod p?
d=gcd(k,p-1)>1

[tex]g^\frac{p-1}{d}[/tex] = +/-1 (mod p)?? I don't think this is right...I think something like g(p-1)/d = 3 (mod p) is also possible, provided 3d=1 (mod p). There are many possibilities and I don't think there is a strict rule...


More help, please? I'm pretty confused now...
Thank you!
 
If we take a look at g^(p-1)/2 it can only be equal to plus or minus 1. This is the case because [g^(p-1)/2)]^2 =1. Thus x^2==1 Mod p has the factors (x-1)(x+1). However those cases do form what is referred to as a subgroup. Since the two cases interact giving us four cases, 1x1, -1x1, 1x-1 or (-1)(-1). The first and last having the value 1 and the other two -1.

A similar thing happens for g^(p-1)/d where d divides p-1. We form a subgroup. It helps to find and study examples.
 
Let [itex]Res[/itex] be the residue system:

[tex]Res=\left\{1^k,2^k,\cdots \left(p-1\right)^k\right\}[/tex]

Every element of it is congruent mod p to a unique element of [tex]\left\{1,2,\cdots \left(p-1\right)\right\}[/tex] (all complete residue systems satisfy this). Therefore, the primitive root g will be congruent mod p to some [itex]a^k \in Res[/itex].

Now, [tex]g^{\frac{p-1}{d}}[/tex] is congruent mod p to a specific value, but you have to apply Fermat's theorem to find it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K