Principal Component Analysis: eigenvectors?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the significance of eigenvectors derived from a covariance matrix. The first eigenvector represents the direction of maximum variability because it corresponds to the largest eigenvalue, indicating the highest variance in the data. PCA operates under the assumption of a multivariate Gaussian distribution, which allows for the covariance matrix to be diagonalized through rotation. This process results in eigenvectors that represent the new axes of the data, with their associated variances as eigenvalues. Understanding this relationship is crucial for effectively applying PCA in data analysis.
evidenso
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hey
Hello, I am dealing with som Principal Component Analysis
Can anyone explain why the first eigenvector of a covariance matrix gives the direction of maximum variability. why this special property of eigenvectors
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multivariate_normal_distribution

A univariate Gaussian has only one variance, which appears in the denominator of the argument of the exponential.
A multivariate Gaussian has a covariance matrix, which appears in the "denominator" of the argument of the exponential.

Principal components analysis essentially assumes a multivariate Gaussian, then rotates the covariance matrix until it is diagonal, so that the diagonal elements are the variances of the rotated variables. The rotated variables are called "eigenvectors" and their variances are called "eigenvalues". The eigenvectors are conventionally arranged so that the one with the largest eigenvalue is "first", which is equivalent the largest variance being "first".
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K