Some comments, the big problem is last.
NDiggity said:
Why are you starting at 1, or even 2? You know 1 is not prime and 2 is prime, as you have these hardcoded as exceptional cases. Print that 2 is prime and start at 3. All that those exceptional cases do is add complexity to the program. A lot (an awful lot) of programming shops measure the "cyclomatic complexity" of code. A lot (not quite as many, but still a lot) of programming shops specifically ban the use of "continue".
Much better would be to end this loop at sqrt(i), or if that is not acceptable, at i-1. Doing either makes a lot more sense than ending at 10.
if (i % j != 0 AND i!=j)
isPrime= true
if (i % j = 0)
isPrime = false
This is the big problem. There are two problems here. First, any number j that divides some other number i means i is not prime. This logic does not test for primality! Another problem: You have a fall through case (i.e., there is no final else). Once again, many programming shops view this as a sign of sloppy programming. Even if a final else is not needed, it is better to put one in that explicitly does nothing. Doing so shows that the programmer has thought about all of the cases.
Bottom line: You really need to fix the primality testing logic. Fixing the loop bounds is a good idea as well.